Spirit Voices Newsletters — Bill Weisensale

an EVP news’etter NIJ? 4 JUNE 1981 COMME The following is a quotation from the “EVP NEWS”, an English Newsletter recent ly initiated by Mr Raymond Cass, 6 Eastcourt Mansions, BridJ.ington, Yorks, England. “The German VTF (El organization -Ed) has reached an active membership of over 1,000 and the media has given increased rather than diminished coverage to a subject which some thought had died in 1974. The Y’IF Newsletter has upgraded to magazine format in glossy style and the annual VT? Conference in Fulda this year will run to an ambitious 7 days.” (This is not a misprint, that’s 1,000. people -- one followed by three zeros. -Ed) Interest in EITP communication in Germany, is but a preview of things to come. Here in the U.S. we have hundreds, or thousands of Electronics Engineers, tens of thousands of Technicians arid hundreds of thousands of electronics hobbyists, many of whom would be interested in and fascinated by, the challenge of El/P reception if it were brought to their attention in a meaningful way. In addition, Citizen Band radios, popularized by truck drivers and by Betty (“First Mama”) Ford, are now in daily use by millions of people. Some of these people, who for the most part are extroverted communiholics, and who have already, unwittingly, trained their ears and minds to discern weak, distorted human voices against a background of aw ful static, will when it finally comes to their attention, take to EVP coiamunica tion like ducks take to water.

Where El/P research is concerned, America is a sleeping giant. But if one looks very closely, there are now faint signs of stirring. Interest here is growing grad ually but steadily. Among our sulscribers, Electronics Engineers and other techni cal people far out number Parapsychologists. The El/P is a psycho-kinetic effect. Although we might say the “psycho” part is in the field of Parapsychology, the “kinetic” half is in the not yet existing fields of Paraphysics and Paraelectronics. Nevertheless, there is already enough interest in the technology of EVP reception that at the moment it is a toss-up as to whether experimental Spirit Voice Receiv ers will come into usage first, or whether the El/P itself will first be officially recognized by science. 1 L In this issue will ‘be the first of an opened ended series of articals on ex-’ perimental Spirit Voice Receiver design and development. A Spirit Voice Receiver is hereby defined as a single unit piece of electronic equipment which is, unlike radios and tape recorders, specifically designed for reception of Spirit voices and for no other purpose, and which is capable of receiving EVP voices without the ne cessity of accessory equipment such as radio receivers, audio amplifiers, tape re corders, etc. Under this definition, SVRs (Spirit Voice Receivers) have techni cally existed since at least 1975. Now, before any of our readers become overly excited and rush down to their local electronics store to pick out the nake and model SVR of their choice,

we must clarify this statexnnet. At the present time SVRs are very crude, very noisy, very inefficient and they do not work significantly better than the methods you are now .using. They are “crystal set” experimental concept designs, o± more inter est to the Engineer, Technician and. electronics hobbyist, t to the person who is engaged in practical EVP communication. Nevertheless from this point onward, we will no longer be discussing the € possibility of a Spirit Voice Receiver. The SVR already exists. What we will be discussing, is further development And a great deal more experimentation, improvement and development will probably be required before the SVR becomes a prac tical household item. There is still much we do not know, but with incresing tech nical interest the time has arrived, as truck drivers say, to “put the hammer down”, and find the answers. -Ed From Mrs Mercedes Shepanek, Virginia, U.S.A. April 1981 (in part) The sound synthesizer we are currently using is a Marsona 1200 “sound condi tioner”. It is manufactured by Narpac Corp., Box 3098 Wilmington, N.C. -- cost $129.00. It has the capability of four distinctly different sounds, accomplished via a series of filters -- namely, Surf 1, Surf 2, Rain, and Waterfall (of about Niagra class). Naturally EVP experimentation was not in their thoughts at the time of design. My experimenting colleague suggested I advise them of the use to which we are putting it to widen the gap between their ears • Come to think

of it, it would be fun to tell them and get the reaction! We have experimented with Surf 2 setting as this has a silence period of about eighteen seconds between surf breaker sounds. Success thus far has been fair but not phenomenal. I would suggest your readership wait for reports of success before investing, We have interesting results from the following, In dubbing actual voices re ceived from the master reels on an Akai reel to reel to a fresh reel on a TEAC reel to reel via patch cord we have had new voices recorded on the TEAC reel rid ing on the end of the dubbed voices. No mike was hooked up, of course, and no other sound source involved -- just the patch cord connection. This is our first experience with this kind of thing. Obviously no microphone is needed. I am won dering if the sound recorded on the original tape is providing the “raw” noise for modulation. As a comment on information in the Newsletter I have received information from several sources (including someone connected with NBC radio) that playing tapes backwards reveals many, many class A voices. 4/3 Reply (In part) I was especially interested in your report of recording new voices while copy ing recordings through a patch cord. Since tape recorders do not pick-up electro magnetic energy (radio signals) and since there was no microphone involved in your system and it was therefore immune to sound or acoustic energy, it would

appear the voices arrived through a cLirect psychokinetic effect on the signal as it passed through the circuits inside of the recorders. This experience is somewhat similar to that of Mr McKee who reported (page 3/3) EVP reception while listening to a lecture tape. Again, no radio receiver and no microphone was involved. It becomes more and more apparent that EVP voices arrive via psychokinetic rather than electromagnetic or acoustic energy. I just received a letter from Sarah who reports she tryed playing some of her tapes backwards and found, much to her surprise, they contain numerious voices. She is now engaged, when she can find the time, in reexamining old tapes in this mode. As mentioned above, neither a radio receiver nor a microphone are essential for EITP reception and in fact, reception can take place without even a tape re corder in the system. In my own early work I had a white noise generator which I sometimes listened to directly through earphones. I have heard a few understand able voices by this method. If your sound synthesizer has an earphone jack and you would care to try this, simply request communication as you normally do, and then listen directly to the synthesizer as you would in playing back a voice re cording. If you do this 10 or 15 minutes at a time on several occasions, unless I miss my guess, you will probably hear at least several voices which are of good enough quality to be

understandable. The voices, of course, are not on tape for later study, but it is an interesting experiment and sheds a certain amount of light on how the voices arrive. Sarah Estep has the following to say about backward voices. He (Dan McKee) had urged me a year ago to listen to the reverse side of my tapes. I had tried it, a time or two, but had never figured out quite how it work ed. In March, he again urged me to play the tapes in reverse. With “grim” deter mination, I tackled the job again, and it is really very simple. And you know -- he is right. There are voices there, many voices! For the last month, after I finish each day’s recording, I turn the tape over and play it on the wrong side. There has never been a day when there hasn’t been at least two messages of good quality there, and some days there are as many as ten. I am very excited about it, and am trying to pass the word on to as many people as possible. At the same time, I am somewhat “distraught” at all of the messages, many of which may be signifi cant, that I and other experimenters, may have missed by failing to play our tapes in reverse. When I have some free time, which isn’t very often, I go back and. play in reverse, a recording made earlier. Some interesting and important messa ges (Such as

No. 35-Tape II have been discovered this way) As of today, I have 185 messages dupLicated. from the reverse side of various tapes. I have put all of these on a seperate duplicate tape and entered them into a special log. You mentioned on pages 3/4 and 3/5, that the thing “doesn’t make sense. .that the voices would have to speak and think backwards at the instant of reception so that their voices would appear forward or normal after the tape is reversed and played backwards.” For the last month I have given this enigma much thought -- for one thing, it helps prove the voices are paranormal for only paranormal voices would be cap able of such feats. Reply (In part) Because a tape recorder is very complicated and contains dozens or hundreds of electronic components, a variation in any one of which, caused by paranormal means, would cause a variation or voice modulation of the signal, it is not yet possible to say at precisely what point or points the psychokinetic effect actually occures. One thing which I believe we can say with certainty, is that whatever the point of effect, when a voice appears backwards on a tape, it is because the incoming psy-. chokinetic “voiceprint” is backwards. If the Spirit contacts the operator’s subconscious mind. (operator dependent reception) by telepathy, activating the psychokinetic center of the operator’s subconscious and thus causing the Spirit’s voice to appear on tape, in this case backwards, it would be logical

to believe that the Spirit is, accidently or deli berately, thinking backwards or thinking forward while traveling backwards relative to sidereal time. I think the Spirits have control over which d.irection their voices appear. I believe they are deliberately causing some to appear backward. and. I think they have a very good reason for doing this. And I further think you have put your finger squarely on that reason when you said - “it helps prove the voices are para normal for only paranormal voices would be capable of such feats.” It adds yet more to the evidence that the Spirits are real. From Mr G. Gilbert Bonner, England January 1981 Introduction to a new technique in recording the Electronic Voice Phenomena. By G. Gilbert Bonner. F.H.A. (Sussex, England). 1981 Many researchers have long suspected that the ‘Intelligences’ behind what we call the “voices” require certain basic sounds in order to manifest, and these my be natural or mechanical. There has been a great deal of speculation about this ap parent ‘metamorphsis’ of sounds, which led British researcher Richard Sheargold to experiment with pre-recorded radio mush. He dismissed the idea of radio stations in the sky as utter rubbish, and doubted the existance of a special Jurgenson fre quency. I established in a test in 1977, that using mechanical noise alone, on replay a voice was heard to say “We are here”. I also made outdoor experiments using “the Doppler shift” effect in which mechanical noises were ‘remodulated’ in some

manner. I still was not convinced however, that some transmissions from a parallel universe could not take place, so developed a technique that allowed modulation of microphone sound, or direct transmissions, by feeding a radio to one input of a stereo deck, and the other to a sensitive microphone that could be used to record radio feedback, or some other sound material, such as dripping water. I had found in outdoor experiments, that voices recorded by portable battery recorder using microphone only, when near water seemed to achieve better results, a point others have mentioned. Most Euro pean researchers use the radio mike or ‘interfrequency’ technique on either med ium wave or short wave, but American researchers have in the main stuck to pure microphone recordings. The recordings of Sarah Estep on air-band marks an in- 4/5 teresting difference, since our study here of the air band recordings made by R. CaSS, indicate an ‘IF’ breakthrough on his Juliet I radio set, which means in fact he obtains a H.F. intrusion. Whether the Estep “voices” use the high white-noise level or some other sound source, is not apparent. It also was obvious that the voice entities did not require of us to use a ‘microphone’, in order to hear what we said, but it did apparently as further experiments show, help them to speak tack to us, and I believe that sometimes our own speech spoken into the microphone, was ‘rernodulated’ and turned back to us, this would account for

some of the voices that sound something like our own, and also hang into our own questions. I should men tion perhaps that when I tried to record on V.H.F., or tJ.H.F., I obtained but a few’whisper’ replies, and the same applied tothe”diode” which I found useless Returning now to Richard Sheargold’s experiments, the radio mush he recorded from live radio, was obviously a mixture of radio stations fading in and out, cre ating a babble of sounds; some clear, some unclear, and he apparently monitored this material. Later when he used it as the basis for questions put to the unseen entities, he found that the replies obtained could also be found on the ‘original’ recording (made before he had thought up his questions). I wondered whether the replies were already on the original, and not heard, and later were assumed to an swer questions, or could the P type effect of the “voices” act on both tapes to produce this effect. It was certainly a problem that defied a logical answer. I had noted that if I recorded where no radio intrusion was taking place, but only white noise, as in UHF then I had only ‘weak’ voices ... whispers. I therefore tuned to a spot on ‘medium wave’ where very weak radio intrusion faded in and out from two foreign stations .. German and Russian .. a spot near 200 meters, or 1600 iCHz. Careful analysis of the material recorded was essential to rule out radio in

trusion from these sideband mixtures, but all my “voices” address me by name in full, and always have done so. Further, in spite of the background mush heard in the actual recording, many voices when ‘isolated’ to another tape, had no apparent background sound; a point confirmed in the examination of my recordings by radio expert H. Sheargold. Indeed I rely upon the use of my name to confirm that the recordings are “paranormal”, and not radio intrusions etc. I live alone, and my own voice is Bass, so as I record many different male, female and childrens voices I see no way in which any of these could be spurious effects, such as an uncontrolled utterance a theory suggested ‘by critic D. Ellis regarding Raudive’s research. Actually I’ve met Ellis twice, he wrote his book before I had published any data so he had, at that time not heard of my own work. His only comment on hearing some of my voice exaintles was “I wish that I had met you sooner”. However I referred to a “new method, and this developed out of my consider ing what was known about ‘remodulation’ and the fact that I (and many European re searchers also), tuned. to interfrequency, to a spot between stations recording normal radio material ... material that could fade in and out of our chosen spot, tuned to white noise. I decided to record a foreign language not understood for 15 minutes on one cassette, and then to

replay, and study it for any sounds that could be interpreted phonetically as English, also to chop it up a bit, so that it made no sense. I then did this with a second recording in a totally different language. Thus in the end, I had two cassettes one say a woman speaking French; and the other a nan speaking German. Both studied for any English sounding words, both recordings stopped and started at random. Now replay this TOGETHER and we have a mixture that is not easy to tolerate, Playing these two recordings from two different recorders each side of the room, with a sensitive microphone placed mid-way between attached to another (3rd) recorder, I began by asking a few usual questions. So on the third cassette were three voices now FRENCH, GERNAN, and my own few words in ENGLISH. As I said not an easy mixture to listen to, BUT, and this is the interesting thing, .three or four new words IN ENGLISH, not in my voice replied to my questions or to the recording situation, and further these voices were not on the originals. They had been “metamorphosed” by the voice entities in some manner using some_‘energy’ unknown to our present science. I submit that here is a ‘new method’ that makes it un-necessary to use live radio and therefore auto xnatically rules out the possibility that the voices are mistaken ‘normal’ radio transmissions. Since I believe the personality of the researcher i as important to the

recordings as the correct equipment, I cannot forecast how others may respond to the use of this method, which I here publish for the first time anywhere, in the hope that it wifl open up new ground in the electronic voice research G. Gilbert Bonner. Sussex gland January 1981. playing German pre-recorded ri recording on blank cassette 2j €1 playing French pre-recorded 3 recorders required SPIRIT VOICE RECEIVERS Part I Theory, Block Digram, The Elementary SVR By Bill Weisensale CO This is the first of an open ended series of articles on the theory, design and development of Spirit Voice Receivers. The following hypotheses, conclusions, and experimental SVR designs are based on nearly seven years of research, experi mentation and study by the author. We do not yet have all the answers, and there still remains much work to be done. Nevertheless, certain basic principles are becoming clear, and the road toward further improvement in the quality of E voice reception is now apparent. It is the author’s hope that through the material in this series of articles, others who are interested in EVP electronics, my be able € to start part way up the ladder, so to speak, rather than from the very bottom as was necessary for the author. ORY In order to design a Spirit voice receiving system, the first question to be answered, is how do the voices arrive ? In essence there are four hypotheses microphone 4/7 which may offer an explanation. We will take

a look at each in turn. The Electromgnetic Hypothesis This is the “radio station in the sky” concept which supposes that the voices arrive in the form of ordinary radio signals. Presumably, each group of Spirits carry about their own radio transmitter, which of course, is both invisible and immaterial, in order to transmit radio signals during the course of EVP comznunica tion. The first fallacy in this hypothesis is that if it were true, then a radio re ceiver would be required in all EVP receiving systen and no voices would be re ceived by any method which did not involve a radio receiver, --- which does not correspond to the facts. Another fallacy in this hypothesis, is the modulation versus mixing effect. It has been noted by practically every EVP researcher, that the voices at times change broadcast voices or music into an EVP voice. In no case is the EVP voice mixed with the broadcast voice or music, as we would anticipate if there were a second radio signal present. Obviously, this is a case of one signal being inodu lated by another signal, not a case of two radio signals mixing together. Also, if the electromagnetic hypothesis were valid, the Spirits would be send ing radio signals directly to our radio receivers, the EVP Operator would not be a link in the system and therefore all EVP researchers would have the same quality reception, --- this too, does not correspond to the facts. Despite these obvious

fallacies, a great deal of time and effort has been ex pended in attempting to learn on what “frequency” the Spirits “broadcast”, and in attempts to build more “sensitive’ (presumably better signal/noise ratio) radio receivers in order to improve reception of what is presumed to be very weak radio signals. All of which, of course, has been to no avail. The Acoustic Hypothesis This is the “Spirits whisper into the microphone” theory. Under this concept the voices arrive in the form of sound waves, presurm created ‘by vocal cords which are both invisible and immaterial. Presumably, they are at a subaudible level when picked up by the microphone and become audible only after being ampli fied by the circuits of the recorder. This hypothesis contains several fallacies, the first and most obvious of which is that if it were true then all voice receiving systems would have to con tain a microphone, and no voice reception would be possible unless a microphone were used, --- which again is not the case. Again, another fallacy in this hypothesis is the modulation versus mixing effect. It has probably been noted by every EVP researcher, that the voices at times change miscellaneous ckground sounds, picked up by the microphone, into EVP voices. In no case is the EVP voice mixed with the ‘ noise as one would anticipate if there were two simultaneous sounds. Again, very obviously this is a case of one signal being modulated by another signal, riot a case of

two sounds mixing together. Also if this hypothesis were true then the ideal reception conditions would be a super-quiet room, a super-sensitive microphone, and a super good signal/noise ratio recorder. In reality, the signal/noise ratio of the recorder imakes no dif ference and in fact some of the best quality voices have been received on the “worst” recorders, super-sensitive microphones and microphone preamplifiers make no discernible difference, and miscellaneous th.ckground sounds, rather then dro ing out the voices as one would anticipate, actually help them to become audible. Also, if the acoustic hypothesis were valid, the Spirits would be whispering directly into the microphone, the EVP Operator would not be a link in the receiving system, and therefore all EVP researchers would receive the same quality voices. Again this siniply does not correspond with the facts. The Combination Hypothesis Under this concept the Spirits use more than one means o± causing their voices to appear, depending upon the receiving system in use. If we use a radio receiver, then they obligingly transmit a radio signal to us, and if we use the microphone method, then they obligingly whisper into the microphone, etc. The fallacy in this hypothesis is that the voices appear in receiving systems € which do not contain a microphone, and which at the same time are totally shielded from radio signals (see page 3/6). In fact, as we shall see later, the voices can and do appear in systems in which there in neither a radio receiver,

a microphone, nor even a tape recorder. Again, if the combination hypothesis is valid, then the Spirits would either be sending us direct radio signals, or they would be whispering directly into the microphone, depending on which method was in use. In either case the Operator would not be a link in the system and therefore, again, all E researchers would receive the same quality voices. Which, again, simply does not correspond to the facts. The Psychokinetic Hypothesis This hypothesis states that an electronic signal, generated by static, broad cast voices or music, ckground sounds, internal white noise, etc., exists in all Spirit voice receiving systems, and that at one or more places in the system, this electronic signal is voice modulated by psychokinetic energy. (That the signal level in an electronic circuit can be effected by psychokinetic energy, has been demonstrated by Mr Ingo Swann under laboratory conditions, at both New York City College and at the Stanford Research Institute. --now SRI International) Under the psychokinetic hypothesis the voices arrive by directly modulating the electronic signal inside of the equipment (there are no sound waves or radio signals). Since there is no known 1 to psychokinetic energy, we could design an experiment in which no microphone is used and in which the whole receiving sys tem is electromagnetically shielded. If EVP voices appear under these conditions then we know, by the process of elimination, that they arrived in the form of psy chokinetic energy, since they could not be

acoustic or electromagnetic. In experi ments of this nature, results are in agreement with the psychokinetic hypothesis (see page 3/6). Also, since Spirits are out of body and therefore not physical, we could an ticipate they would communicate by mental rather than by physical means. Under th psychokinetic hypothesis, the Spirits do not need physical devices such as radio transmitters or vocal cords They would be communicating by using psychokinetic energy, which is, of course, a strickly mental process. Another point which needs to be mentioned, is the mixing versus modulation effect. Under the psychokinetic hypothesis there would be, in theory, two possible means by which the voices could enter the circuit. First, they could. create a sec ond signal and inject this signal into the circuit at one or more points, much as we use a signal injector when trouble shooting. Or, second, they could psychokinet ically effect the electronic characteristics of one or more componets. If we look at these two possibilities closely, we note the first method is physical whereas the second method is mental. We also note that the first method would result in a mixing effect, whereas the second possibility,, in which they would vary, for example, the resistance of a resistor, the conduction of a transistor, the decay rate of the electromgnetic field. in a transformer, the flux density of one of the permnent xiagneta, etc., etc., (there are dozens of possibilities), by using psychokinetic energy, would result in a modulation effect on whatever

elec tronic signal happened to be passing through the system at the time. At this point we have no reason to believe it is possible to psychokinetically inject a second signal into a circuit. However, we do know, from previously men tioned laboratory experiments, that it is possible for psychokinetic energy to change the signal level in an electronic circuit, and we could therefore presume this would be the mode of operation. This, of course, would cause modulation of the signal, rather than mixing, --- this again agrees with experimental results. Under the psychokinetic hypothesis, only three conditions need exist in order for voice reception to occur. 1 There must be an electronic signal present which contains random or multi- frequencies within the voicebe.nd. This signal my be generated by radio static, radio broadcast voices or music, radio White noise, miscellaneous or deliberate microphone sounds, white noise within the tape recorder, etc., or any combination thereof. The actual source of the electronic signal mkes little difference. The only thing really required, is that such a signal be present within the circuits of whatever equipment happens to ‘be in use. 2 The electronic signal must pass through one or more components, devices, or circuits who’s electronic characteristics are subject to change under the influ ence of psychokinetic energy. At this point or points, the envelope of the elec tronic signal is changed to correspond to the Spirit voice, that is, the signal is psychokinetically voice modulated. This component, device, or circuit,

which is subject to the influence of psychokinetic energy and in which the signal is voice modulated, is called (naturally) the Psychokinetic Modulator or PK Mod. At this point the only device definately known to act as a Psychokinetic Modualtor, is the speaker/microphone coupling (see page 1/5), although other devices, such as taDe recording heads are under suspicion 3 The signal must be amplified to listening or recording level, and applied to an output device such as a speaker, earphones or a tape recording head. If the psychokinetic hypothesis is valid, then anytime the about three re q.uirernents are met EVP voices could, potentially, appear. We would expect for example that they could appear when playing th.ck any kind of tape on a tape re corder, or during the course of copying a tape through a patch cord from one re corder to another, etc., and again this agrees with experimental results. (see page 3/3 and As a bottom line, the electromgnetic, acoustic, and combination hypotheses, fl ‘be eliminated from further practical consideration because of’ their various - serious contradictions with experimental results. The psychokinetic concept 1 the only one of the four able to withstand close scrutiny, and can therefore be taken as a working hypothesis. If the psychokinetic hypothesis is valid, the question immediately arises as tO where this energy originates. On the one hand, if our equipment is being di. r effected by the Spirits, then the Operator would not be a link in the re lving

system and we could anticipate that all EVP researchers would receive about the same quality voices. Conversely, if communication is indirect, that is, if the Ptrits telepathically activate the Operator’s subconscious psychokinetic ability, nd thuz cause their voices to appear in our equipment through use of the Operator’s P energy, then we could anticipate that a few individuals, who happen to have PK ability, would get good quality EVP reception, while for most it would flon-existant. 0 The fact of the matter is, both of these effects seem to be in evidence. On ne hand, it is undeniable that a few people are EVP xned.iums and for them reception relatively good. On the other hand, in so far as we know, anyone who has the Vitience and determination to train their ears and. minds for EVP reception, and may require weeks or even months, will be able to discern and understand EVP ‘otces. To answer our question then, it appears that the necessary psychokinetic t can and does originate either in the Spirit communicator or in the subcon Lous of the E Operator, depending upon whether or not the Operator is an E Spirit Spirit Telepathic link PK link Operator Equipment Equipment (direct reception) (Operator dependent reception) At this point it might be reasonably argued that all EVP reception is Qperator Hpendent and the fact that everyone (with enough patience) can get EVP reception 1:1 because everyone has a certain sirall degree of psychokinetic ability. The •titt.hor does not believe

this to be the case for certain complicated reasons which W LI. not be discussed here. However, whether such be the case or not is a subtle tLnt for Parapsychologists to determine (and for science to argue about) and is “ no inicortance as far as the electronics are concerned. In either case we are ‘ with a weak psychokinetic effect and. we need. devices which are more sensi to this effect. One point needs to be clarified. In the case of an EYP medium, the psycho no tic energy effecting the equipment originates in the subconscious mind of the ‘i We are not saying the voice or the intelligence behind the voice orig U the Operator’s mind. What we are saying is that the Spirits simply use the 4/11 Operator’s psychokinetic energy in order to effect the electronics Basic SVR Design Since in all methods of EVP reception it is necessary that we supply an elec tronic signal and make it available for use as a carrier by the voices, it is ob vious that the first circuit needed in any SVR design, is a carrier generator. Over the years n attempts have been made by various researchers, to obtain voice modulation of non-voice carriers. Many pages could be written about these at tempts which have ranged from audio tones to lasers, but let it suffice here to say only that they have not succeeded. In designing an experimental SVR we will there fore use a white noise generator

for a very pragmatic reason -- - it works Our next step is to take the signal through a device, component, circuit or arrangement of circuits in which psychokinetic voice modulation of the signal has an opportunity to take place. We call this part of the Receiver, of course, the Psychokinetic Modulator. As mentioned previously, the only device we know of for sure, at this time, which is capable of operating in this capacity, is the speaker/ microphone coupling (see page 1/5). After generating an appropriate carrier and. presenting it for voice modula tion, the next logical step is to dispose of the carrier. At this point a prob lem arises. If we were dealing with a non- voiceband carrier, a simple peak de tector or filter would suffice. Even if the carrier were in the voiceth.nd, but were a single tone instead of random frequency, it could still be disposed of by a notch filter. However, the random frequency, random amplitude noise carrier we are actually dealing with is not so easily eliminated. There are two possible so lutions, one analog the other digital. The digital solution, suggested by Mr Herb Burnfin jr., will be explained in detail in a later issue. The analog solution is to use a differential amplifier and eliminate the carrier via common mode rejection. Although this arrangement, in theory, should clarify even the weakest EVP voices, in actual practice, signal distortion in the speaker/microphone coupling is so severe, the author has thus far been

able to obtain no better than 10 db of carrier suppression. Although this improves the quality of voice reception enough to be noticeable, the improvement is still relatively insignificant. Especially so when we consider that this general circuit arrangement contains the potential for full clarification. The main thrust of future research will be concentrated in efforts to develop Psychokinetic Modulators which are both more efficient, i.e., more sensitive to PK energy, and at the same time cause less signal distortion, which in turn would permit the differential amplifier/detector to work more effectively in eliminating the carrier. And to develop more sophisticated carriers better suited to the pur pose. , i , ‘ ‘ %& $) 4i 1) ) 4’ ‘1’ 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 4s ‘L EX1 s VOICE RECEIVER Block Diagram • • • I generator Ps:: am:er er peak voiceband detector voiceband limiter - filter - (differential filter 3 db 300 - 3KHz amplifier) 300 - 3KHz • Carrier Module PK Mod. Module Amp Module Concept by L t,< • : 7 4/13 The last step, of couxse, is to amplifX the voice signal and present it to the speaker. (see detailed diagram page 4/12) The concepts, as shown on page 4/12, are included in U.S. Patent Office Appli cation # 8,751 Oct 5 ‘78 (Spirit Voice Receiver) and application # 038,590 May 14 ‘79 (Spirit Voice Receiver Detector). Both of these applications, which were submitted by the author, were rejected, and the concepts included

therein are now unpatentable public property. The Elementary Spirit Voice Receiver The following circuit, devised by the author in 1975 and described at that time in letters to Mr Harold Sherman, is, to the best of author’s knowledge, the World’s first “Spirit Voice Receiver”. Other circuits, diode devices used by Raudive, the “gonioineter”, etc., predate this circuit by some years, however, these devices were receiving system accessories that had to be used with other equip ment, in most cases tape recorders, and where not capable, in and of themselves, of receiving EVP voices. The circuit shown below, a mere handful of parts, two 9V transistor ‘catteries, and a headset, is capable of Spirit voice reception without any other equipment such as radios, amplifiers, tape recorders, etc. To the best of the author’s knowle&ge, this circuit, which the author, being a “new kid” in EVP research at the time, originally called an’lnterdi.mensional radio”, re to this day the simplest electronic device which is capable, in and of itself, of E voice re ception. This circuit is shown here not because it works well, but because It works. (if one has enough patience) In a total of perhaps 3 hours of direct listening, the author has heard no more than - dozen words which were understandable. Several 10 K 1Mf 100 K 14.114 were whispered pleas for “help”. Exactly how the voices enter this system remains unknown, although as an educated guess, the author now believes PK modulation oc curs in the

miniature speakers of the earphones which form, in essence, half of a speaker/microphone coupling, which we already o u to PK energ (see page 1/5) - -. The author does not recommend building this circuit for direct listening un less the builder has lots and lots of patience. However, the circuit is useful as a white noise generator in the “amplifier” method of voice record.irig (see page 1/10). We might mention that the circuit, as shown, does not pick up radio signals in weak signal areas, but when we later tryed to use this circuit in the Los Angeles area, which is a very strong radio signal area, several radio stations faded in and out. This problem can be solved by forward biassing the diode rather than re verse biassing as shown. Also, a silicon diode seems to provide a slightly more uniform white noise than the germanium diode shown. No value is given for Ri as this must be determined by experimentation and depends on the type of diode used and direction of biassing. This circuit isof primary interest because of the fact that it contains neither radio receiver, microphone, nor tape recorder, and yet is still capable of very weak EVP voice reception. From Sarah Estep, Maryland, USA February 1981 (in part) On page 2/3 you mentioned that voices received on one recorder are also re-. ceived on any other recorder in the same room. This may happen frequently but I am afraid I must take issue with

the idea that it always happens. In Talks With The Dead by William Welch (page 126) he mentions a lecture he gave at California State in Northridge. At the conclusion eight who had brought tape recorders, plus Bill, tried an experiment in the lecture room, to see it they could all get messages. Out of the nine tape recorders in use,Bill was the only one to rceive paranormal voices. Eight messages came through during the four min ute recording. This same situation has also happened to me more than once. On the tape I mailed to you (Numbers 76-82 7/22/80) you will remember that I picked up those voices while walking through a haunted lighthouse in southern Maryland. Numbers 80 and 81 were recorded while I was alone in the yellow bathroom, so we must dis count those, but the others were taped while I was with the Stallings. Nancy, who is a natural medium, was carrying a small portable tape recorder, similar in aual ity to my own Sanyo. For all of the mentioned messages, I was in the same room, within six feet of her. The “ was seeing the war” message was recorded while we were crowed together, shoulder to shoulder, in the basement. The following da.y when’ w played the tapes back there was nothing on the Stalling tape, ‘out the mes sages I sent you, plus one other, were on my tape. More recently the Staflings and the Roers came to my home one evening

to try and contact loved ones as well as to attempt to get some spirit photographs. > office is not large, perhaps 10’ by 12’ and with all of my electronic equipment it is close quarters. The Roers and Stallings each brought portable tape recorders and I used my TEAC reel-reel. I am including on this new tape (Numbers 15-20) some of the things that came through that evening. Out of the six messages the “Tom” message was the only one that the Stallings and Roers also taped on their own tape L 5 recorders. The Roers didn’t get anything else. The Stallings had one other ines sage beside “Tom” and it caine when Nancy called on Gus. It was Class A, and was a message that my tape recorder did not receive. How can we explain all of this? The “ was seeing the war” is an unusually clear message, and some of the messages included on this tape the evening the Stallings and Roers came are also of good quality. Surely any tape recorder in the vicinity should have gotten the same messages. There is one difference, however, and perhaps important. I was using no sound source (such as my. radio) while I was in the lighthouse. I therefore have to think that all of the messages I received at the lighthouse originated inside my own portable tape recorder in some way. This is easier to understand than the office recording in which I had my radio tuned.

to the air- as usual. I heard all of the voices speaking through the radio (but not what they actually said until playback). The Stallings and Roers also heard the voices, but for some reason, except for “Tonf’ the other voices placed their mes sages only on my TEAC reel-reel. Figure that one out!! I surely can’t! It seem to me that the message Nancy got from Uncle Gus, and which I didn’t -- and which was not heard through the radio, falls into the same category as the point Lookout messages. In other words it originated within Nancy’s tape recorder. Have you any thoughts about this? It is a real puzzler, but I am inclined to think it y be of some significance. Reply You are quite correct in pointing out that voices received on one recorder are not necessarily received on every other recorder in the same room. What I had in mind at the time, but did not clarify, is that if one person is wo alone and using more than one recorder, the voices will appear simultaneously in whatever recorders the Operator happens to be using at the time. I have recorded the same voices on as high as 5 different channels (3 recorders) simultaneously. However, in experiments during the early part of this year, I have learned this too is not an iron clad rule. In these experiments which involved using two different receiving systen simultaneously with a single stereo recorder, most of the voices

appear only, or of better quality, on the channel which is (presumbly) more sensitive. However, a few appear only, or of better quality, on the opposite channel. It appears the Spirits are able to direct their voices to a greater ex tent than we had heretofore realized. Surprisingly enough, it would appear that ownership of the equipment is an important factor. If there are several people in the same room, each of whom have their own recorders, and one is an E medium, it seerr the voices are directed to the equipment which is owned by the medium, rather than to all of the recorders in the room. There is still much we do not know about this subject. In a recent letter from Mr Davis Peck, Dave reports he has recovered fairly well from the beating he suffered last summer during the course of a hold-up at his place of employment. Dave is presently in the process of trying to improve his financial situation so that he can purchase the necessary equipment to again become involved in EV? research. We believe Dave has contributed much to the E’TP effort in the past and we hope to see him participate again in the future. Dave also mentioned that he suggested the new Realistic CTR-47 monophonic cassette recorder with progran auto-repeat, to another EITP researcher, who 4 L found it very useful for repetitive listening. As the author understands it, this recorder which is available through Radio Shack, has two resetable

memory counters and can be set to automatically and continuously repeat the section of tape between he two counter settings. This should be ideal for EVP p1ay (and save a lot of wear on one’s pinky) If anyone knows of a stereo recorder or tape deck that has this feature, please let us know. Format 4 As yau have noticed, the pages in this Letter are all separate sheets which 4 have been stapled together rather than folded. They also have been hole punched for easy storage in a standard 3 ring notebook cover. After an issue is inserted into the cover, removing the staples will allow the pages to lay flat for easy read ing and reference. This format will remain unchanged, we will not be changing to a different page size, etc. Also our weird page numbering system is designed to make reference through tack issues easy. 4 It is our intention that The Spirit Voice be something more than just a cur rent events type publication. We intend to gether and print as much information as possible which may be of help in any way, so that as time goes on, the collected issues of the “Voice” will become a continuously updated EVP communications “man ual”. If any of your ck issues are lost, strayed, stolen, or have been used as a coloring book by your neighbor’s yr old, and you would like to keep your col lection complete, replacement th.ck issues are available. (order blank on

last page) Complimentary Copies Previous to May of this year, it was our policy to send out complimentary copies of the current issue plus ck issues to anyone who’s name was suggested to us. As you can well imagine, with the publication of each new issue, sending out ck issues becomes progressively more expensive, and for this reason we have had to discontinue this practice. We will, however, now and in the future, con tinue to send a copy of whatever issue happens to be current, to anyone who is suggested to us, unless we have already sent a copy to that individual. So if you know of one or several individuals or Organizations whom you be lieve my be interested in what we are doing, please do not hesitate to send us their name and address. We believe it is important to expand the network of com munication between people who are interested in EVP and survival research, and we would like to reach everyone who might be interested. (also if we get a large enough number of subecriptions, this Newsletter may someday get out of the red) Copyright ? ? ? Most publications, including many Newsletters are copyrighted, which in essence, means it is illegal to reproduce all or any part of the publication without the “express permission of the Editor” etc. Our philosophy is different. The very reason for the existence of this Newsletter is to distribute information about the Eli’. If you wish to copy articles,

letters, etc., from an issue, or for that mat ter, whole issues, and send them to others, please feel free to do so. We have no objections to this practice. If you place your issues in a notebook and remove the staples, as suggested above, the pages can be easily removed, photocopied and returned to the cover. r 4/i? Highly Recommended Books “Phone Calls From The Dead” by D. Scott flogo and Raymond Bayless Berkley Publishing Corporation “The Dead are Alive” by Harold Sherman Mr Harold Sherman, Highway 5, South Mountain View, Arkansas, 72560 “After We Die, What Then?” George W. Meek METAscience Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 747 Franklin, N.C. 28734 From a letter by the author to another Researcher (in part) EVP researchers are a rather sophisticated lot, and I believe it is universally realized that the hui mind has a tendency, especially where audible and visual stimuli are concerned, to form patterns which do not exist in objective reality. This has been a major concern of many of us, especially during our first year or two of research. Do these voices actually exist in objective reality or are they imaginary patterns constructed by the mind ? At least some of us have attempted to devise tests to determine which was the case. We are speaking here, of course, only about the weakest voices. Stronger voices leave absolutely no doubt in the operator’s mind as to whether they are real or imaginary. During my first year, I noticed that

at certain places on my tapes there seem ed to be voices and yet I could not really say for sure that I had actually heard the voice. That is, I found that at certain places, pertain voices would “come into my mind”. I assumed, of course, these voices were imaginary constructs. That is, I thought so until I began to notice that it was always the same voice, saying 1 Subscription -- U.S.A., Canada -- (6 issues) -- $ 10 per year _____ Subscription -- Overseas -- $ 15 per year (u.s. Currency) (6 issues - Airmail) _____ Back Issues -- Please specify issues desired U.S.A., Canada -- $ 1.7.5 each I Overseas (Airmail) -- $ 2.50 each (u.s. Currency) NAME STREET ADDRESS - CITY — STATE __________________ ZIP COUNTRY Bill Weisensale Box # B. Barstow, CA 92311 U.S.A. L 8 the same words, and that these words “caine into my mind” at the same place on the tape. Now I would like to emphasize, at this point, that these voices were not from distant radio stations because I rarely used a radio, and they were not miscellane ous microphone sounds because I rarely used a microphone. What I did use, in most cases, was an electronic white noise generator connected by patch cord to the voice recorder. Electronic white noise sounds some what like the “hiss” of a gas flame, very even with a very uniform average amplitude. It has no amplitude “lumps” which would encourage the mind

to form voice patterns where, in fact, none existed. In any case I started doing “blind” tests. When I “heard” such a voice I would note it’s location on the counter, cover the counter, rewind the tape some distance and again start the tape forward, all of which was done with the counter covered so I had no idea where I was at on the tape. If the same voice again “caine into my mind”, I would then uncover and check the counter. Using this process I found that many times the same voice would appear, time after time, at exactly the same count and I was forced to conclude that such voices were objectively real but below the threshold of my conscious hearing. It is now, of course, generally realized among serious EVP researchers, that many of the weakest EVP voices are first recognized, not by the conscious mind, but rather through the process of subliminal perception. But as I say, this was 6 or 7 years ago and at that time EVP research was not as sophisticated as it is today. Today we know there are thousands of such voices which are ignored because they are believed to be imaginary, or are missed entirely by researchers because they are on a subliminal or near subliminal level. -Ed Donations During the past several years we have received modest donations to help fur ther EVP research. Although the sum total of these donations has amounted to less than 3 %

of the 6,ooo dollars EVP research has cost the author during the past seven years, they were nevertheless gratefully appreciated, especially so because of the moral support they imply. However, as of this writing, no further donations will be accepted, either for the Newsletter or for electronics research and devel op men t. Notice Due to an agricultural project which we are initiating here at the ranch this Summer, it will be necessary to suspend further EVP research and writing for approx imately the next three month. The author’s regular job plus this project, which among other things, involves building a reservoir and laying over 2,000 feet of irrigation line, will occupy practically every minute of available time between now and the middle of Sept. In the mean time, Mary and I hope all of our readers have a very fine Summer, and we hope this issue will give you some things to ponder. THE SPIRIT VOICE is edited and published by Bill Weisensale, Box # B. Barstow, CA 92311, as a service to all who are interested in Electronic Voice phenomena. Your hypotheses, opinions, viewpoints and comments are invited. Any statements printed in The Spirit Voice are open for discussion. an EVP newsletter NU1IBER 5 COMPLUENTABY EDITION JULY - S 1983 A? LONG SILENCE - - - - We would first of all like to thank our readers for being patient, and especially to thank our Friends who have been most understanding during a dJ.f ficult period. When it

became apparent that it would no longer be possible to publish this letter on a reasonably regular 1 it was hoped we might publish perhaps one or two issues per year, but until recently even this proved to be impossible due to new deme.nd.s on the author’s time. Now however, partly because of the recession which has cut tack on the aver age workweek to some extent and partly due to other factors, it has again become possible to devote a bit more time to electronics research and at least some time to writing. One of the proble which has been solved, was the problem of electrical power, a problem one rarely thinks about in the city -- unless of course a fuse blows. In 1976, when we bought our 15 acres of sand. sagebrush and rattle snakes, in the middle of nowhere, 7 miles from the nearest powerline, what power was needed was supplied by an antique but economical one cylinder powerplant. Since our refrigerator, kitchen range and water heater work on propane and in addition to electric lights, there are also several gas lights in the house, the powerplant was not needed more than about once a week for domestic usage. As a result of the author’s work in E research however, the power was used, over the years, for several thousands of hours to operate electronic equipment, a. well a our electric typewriter. In time the powerplant deterio rated to the point where it had lost most

of it’s power and used a quart of oil every three hours, and then finally, before the last newsletter was published, gave up entirely. Because of the unit’s age we still do not have the parts needed for an overhaul. Several years ago we purchased a larger, surplus Navy generator as a stand by unit and to operate our washer and dryer and other larger tools and appli 5/2 ances which were gradually accumulating. However, operating an 8,500 watt 2 ton monstrosity, which drinks almost a gallon of fuel per hour, in order to operate a 25 watt soldering iron or a 100 watt ty-pewriter, is not what one might call pratical, -- and yet this is exactly what we did in order to publish the last is sue of this letter. € During the past 18 month, we have further developed our 12 V .ttery power system, which originally contained a single marine be.ttery to operate our radio telephone, - a necessity because as a Truck Driver the author is on call 2 hours a day and where we live is also 7 miles from the nearest telephone lines. We have now added 3 more .tteries to the system which are charged by a service station type .ttery charger. 12V fluorescent table lamps, including two on the elec tronics workbench, have been added, as well as other 12V lights and. equipment, including a color TV. Inverters, which are devices used to convert 12V DC to 120V 4 AC power,

are now used to operate electronic equipment, soldering irons, ampli fiers, recorders and. experimental SVRs. As these words are typed, the typewriter itself is being powered through a 200 watt inverter from the 12V ttery bank. It is now possible to operate test equi’cment, SV1 eta., or this typewriter, for 5 or 6 hours and then run the gen— erator for pe±a.ps 4 hour to recharge the batteries. Although the question of electrical power is trivial to most people, it has been a considerable problem to € the author in EVP research arid writing, which we are now very happy to have solved. Although forced. by circu. which were for a time getting out of con trol, to take a Sabbatical leave, as it were, the author has always considered this newsletter, which was temporarily suspended, and electronics research, which was continued at a slower rate during this period, to be unfinished business un til all of the ini’or about the principles of reception, given to us by the Spirits over the years, is de I and fully explained to other researchers, and until EVP reception is clarified. There is now another American newsletter (AA-EYP) which, in the capable hands of Sarah Esteo, is doing an excellent job of covering EVP events and developments, as well as organizing and consolidating the American EVP effort. * Since another paper now exists, arid since the author believes we are now in P the ‘ days” of Paraelectronics research before non-mediumist±c Voice recep

tion is clarifIed, and since electronics is the author’s pri interest, this P paper will be slanted toward Spirit Voice Receiver technology, although we will continue to print information of general interest Since the next several issues will be complimentary until we determine whether it will be possible to oublish on a regular basis, new “subecriptions”, due to printing and -l costs, will p have to be temporarily limited to Scientists and Technical people who are inter ested in SYR development. D Spirit Voice Receiver (slrR) Any special electronic equipment which has been specifically d.eaigued for the purpose of Spirit Voice reception, arid which is in a complete single unit. Every thing necessary, including audio amplifier, speaker, carrier generator, P! odu lator, etc., must be included arid must be built into a single cabinet or on a 5/3 single experimental board. (In usage since 1977-’78. The term Spirit Voice Receiver is a clear concise description of the electronic equipment to which it refers. According to the Dictionary, the primary meaning of the word communica tion is; a transmitting. In electronics the word cornmnMcation means to transmit information. A Spirit Voice Receiver is a receiver --- not a communication device. One does not need a transmitter to speak to either God or the Spirits.) Spirit Voice Receiving System (SVR system) Same definition as Spirit Voice Receiver, except that a system is in two or more separate units, which is often more convenient for experimentation, rather than being built into one enclosure.

Potentially, any Voice receiving system can be redesigned into a single unit Spirit Voice Receiver (In usage since 1977-’78) Psychokinetic Modulator (PK Mod) The special, unorthodox circuitry in a Spirit Voice Receiver between the carrier generator and the comparison detector or audio amplifier, specifically designed to allow psychokinetic modulation of the carrier to occur and. to amplify the per centage of any such modulation received. The PR Mod may be of any experimental design, single or multistage, with or without feed1 excitation generator, auto matic level control, or other accessary circuits, etc. (In usage since about 1979 - formerly referred to as Telekinetic Modulator.) Psychokinetic Sensor (PR Sensor) rji Psychokinetic information-pickup device. - The as yet unidentified, specific electronic component or specific force field, one of who’s electrical character istics is changed under the influence of PR energy, similar to the manner in which the resistance of a photoresister is changed under the influence of light, which causes the audio carrier to be Voice modulated by PX energy as it passes through the element. At least one PK Sensor exists in every radio and in every recorder which is capable of EVP reception. The identity of the PR Sensor is the missing key, the last pe 1 of what needs to be kuown about Spirit Voice Receiver design in order to build an efficient Receiver. (Term recently coming into usage - formerly known as Voice entry point, point of entry, modulation point, etc.) Psychokinetic Transducer A hypothetical element which, if

it exists, would. convert psychokinetic energy directly into electrical energy and greatly simplify Spirit Voice Receiver de sign as it could be connected directly to the input of a low noise, high gain audio amplifier/speaker arrangement, which would eliminate the carrier generator, Pk Modulator, detector and filters. (Because of fundamental system differences and mutual interference, an SVR system must use either a carrier and PR Modulator, or it must use a PK Transducer. Both cannot be used simultaneously in the same system.) EVP Electronic Voice Phenomena - Voices in electronic equipment who’s presence, mode of arrival and source, are unexplainable within the framework of Science. Inclusive of, but not limited to, Spirit Voice reception. A second category is the reception of Voices believed to be of extraterrestrial origin. (The term EVP is descriptive, universally understood, -- and long established. A recent suggestion to change this term to something else, is unjustified.) EVP “Breakthrough” The long awaited, but yet to be invented electronic Spirit Voice receiving equip ment which would, like an ordinary radio receiver or TV set, work efficIently, * I o I:). ‘/2w MAA qv \- I SPIHIT VO1C BEC — B By Date UNRE —-. 1000)1.1: 300MA 25V -f- iW Y I -1- 2. V Ri 47012 Y - 51.5 - and work equally well for everyone. Since The Last Edition One of the most significant events since the last issue of this paper was the for of the American Association - Electronic Voice Phenomena, under Sarah Estep.

The organization is involved in a wide range of aätivities which in cludes publication of a quarterly newsletter, organization of meetings, couseling, and .king El/P sample tapes available, as well as pure research. One aspect which is of considerable value, is the notification to each member of the names and ad— dresses of other members in the same state. In the field today, due to the fact that Voice reception has not yet been clarified, there is still a certain emphasis on electronics. However, we must not lose sight of the fact that electronics is a minor part of the El/P. It is not mysterious black boxz, but rather the familiar Voices of deceased friends and re latives which convince people survival is a fact. And. it is an expanding circle of EVP knowledge, an increasing number of people engaged in EVP reception, which is increasing the awareness level of our society. What is needed in the U.S., is an organization similar to the VTF in Geri The AA - El/P is rapidly becoming such an organization. Membership is a mustu for anyone serious about El/P re search. The AA-EVP will hold a National Conference at the Hyatt Regency hotel, .lti more, .ryland, August 26-28. Featured speakers include George Meek, Cenneth Ring, Walter Uphoff and Stuart Wilde. Harold Sher and his wife .rtha will be spe cial guests. For reservations or more infori contact the AA-EVP (See ad dress list) TAscience Spirit Voice Receivers. By this time most of our

readers are aware that since the last issue of this letter, Metascience has announced they have been working quietly on SVR design since the early 1970s. This family of experimental SVR concepts and equipment, some old and some new, (Family name “sPIRIco is numbered 1 1 through .rk 10. Work on the first several concepts has been discontinued in order to concentrate on the other hypotheses. Of the 10 concepts thus far proposed, the advanced version of the I’Iark 4 i most noteworthy, both from an efficiency standpoint and from the standpoint of ad vanced design, since it is thus far the only design to incorporate the very impor tant priniciple of feedback in the PK Modulator section, which the Spirits recom mended to the author’s wife in 1976. (see pages 2/9, 3/10) It should also be es pecially noted. that the advanced ? 4 incorporates a speaker/microphone coupling within the feed loop. (see page 1/5) Although most of the reception quality thus far obtained with Netascience SVRz can apparently be attributed to Mr O’Neil’s exceptional mediumistic ability, the advanced version of the rk 4 does incorporate two of the most important principles of S design, as well as the experimental speaker/microphone coupling, and is thus an excellent starting point for further research. Since the System incorporat a radio transmitter/receiver coupling, and also •1 r1 & iiI) 4) 4) ¼1.’ & %& .&. v v 4 # J 1 SPE4 1< IT LI CONTROL JAcK SPIRIT VOICE RECEIVER Experimental ____

- t REG. IN VOL. /0K +12V 2 pfr 4.7 1 4 7 Iooo I.. -1-’ ‘ 4-7QpF I L__ I3LIJLLET ELECTRON/CS /v 5/7 a speaker/microphone coupling, the following direct comparsion experiment is sug gested in order for the experimenter to determine for hi whether the Voices arrive in the radio fr section or in the audio frequency section. feedl [ ca L (do not use // stereo source r speaker/microphone Voice couplings here) recorder ______ eaker miC pr patc feed1 Note - It is recommended that a study of the Metascience SITR manual and the separate 3.rk Li. supplement, as well as the demonstration tape which contains excellent medi umistic Voice samples, be made before experimentation is undertaken. (see address list) Also, a dual-trace oscilloscope is necessary to determine feed phase, (it must be positive) relative signal levels, etc. (Since speaker/microphone couplings and tape recorders without an input, are both iown to be capable of Voice reception, evidence that reception actually occured. at other than these two places would require that no speaker or microphone be in cluded. anywhere within the receiving system, all connections between the system and Voice recorder be via patch cords, and that the carrier signal plus whatever Voice modulation it may contain, be converted from analog to digital and recorded on a digital recorder.) Life-Beyond-Death Research Foundation, Inc. Since the last issue of this letter, another new organization has been form ed. (The relationship of this organization with Metascience, is not completely clear.) The

stated near-term goals o±’ the LBD are: “First, obtain the funds needed to greatly increase the research on the audio and video system for com with those who have shed their physical bodies, and - - - - Second, wisely allocate these funds in the U S A and foreign countries to those researchers who have the greatest potential for perfecting such equip ment at the earliest date.” Specific Objective: “Create a snail, low-overhead skeleton organization that can effectively 5/8 channel a minimum $500,000 (this figure is correct - we counted the zeros three times - Ed.) per year for-at least 3 to .5 years into the hand.s of the World.’ s best qualified researchers. Certainly a noble effort to raise the awareness level of nankind, by an - € pressive group of people. However, considering the current condition of our civilization, if the LBD, or for that natter, any other organization, can actual ly raise this a of funding for EVP research, it will be a .racle dwarfed only by the resurrection of Christ. But in any case, they definately deserve a triple “A” for effort, whether they are able to fully meet their goals or not. (In anurox inately the same period of time, the American tribe will spend 167 .llion dollars on the research and development of re efficient ways of killing people, in order to prevent the Russian tribe from taking over the wate --- which should give us some clue about the current awareness level

of our civilization.) It is the stated objective of the LED to nake grants to the World’s best qua].- € if ied researchers. Since there are as yet no Paraelectronics experts, the author does not envy the Found.ation the job of deciding who is st qn in this € field. The author does hope however, that in naking such decisions, the Foundation will consider that some of the World’s st important inventions were nad.e by people € who were not educated enough to realize what they did was impossible. And that because of it ‘s extremely unorthodox nature, the E’TP is anyone ‘s allgane. Or as € one of our readers once quipped, --- “In VP research, the only difference between an gineer arid a Technician, is that the igineer is capable of going further in the wrong direction, in a shorter period of time.” The LED is offering Memberships plus a quarterly newsletter, and accepting donations. Certainly, membership in this organization is a M for anyone seri- 4 ously interested in EVp electronics research. (see a4dress list) And, there is no better cause to wt one could donate than a serious effort to raise the aware- 4 ness level of n € ‘I’HE O ‘FECT . . . I I I I I € From time to time, during the course of electronics research, the author has 4 noted that an exceptionally loud Voice will come through. By “loud” we mean for non-mediumistic reception. (sarah Es tap or n

McKee would probably consider such Voices to be of low quality.) Typically there are only one or two or three words by one or sometimes two Voices. These words are much louder than all the other words on the tape, even though they are all recorded at the same time, with the same equioment, under the same circuii Typically this one—shot effect is the first one or two Voices on the tame when recording with a new equi setup. Although the effect has been in±’recuent, It has nevertheless been persistent over the years. At first the author found this quite puzzling arid wondered why, if the Spirits could come through at such an un derstandable level on occasion, they did. not do thiz all the time. The effect has never been repeated with the same equipment, no natter how ch re recording was done, nor have direct requests to repeat the effect been headed. (Theodor Rudolph, in development of the “goniometer”, was probably the first to note this effect.) In time the author has come to believe that on these occasIons a strong med- iun in the 5oirit World, literally hits our grossly insensItive equi with a 5/9 ‘jolt” of psychokinetic energy in order to force a few words through at a much higher level than is normi for non-mediumistic reception. And the reason they do this is to indicate to the experimenter he is working in the right general (but not necessarily specific) direction. These one—shot Voices are always

encourag ing with messages such as - “Good” or “Record more” or “That’s good”, etc. The author believes this is an indication of approval of the equipment setup or some part of the equipment, or pe±aps approval of the hypothesis upon which the equip ment is tased, even though the equipment itself my be all wrong. Interestingly enough, over the years these one-shot Voices have led consistently in the same gen eral direction. If during the course of your work you should experience this “one-shot” effect, it is protably an indication the equipment you are working on is in the Ball Park. It is not necessarily an indication you are anywhere in the vicinity of home plate, although you might be. You my be somewhere way out in left field, but at least you are somewhere inside the Pall Park, and further work in the same general di rection is indicated. ••aIS••SI•I SPIRIT VOICE RECEIVER DEVELOP Part II PSYcH0KThL ? Part I In 1976, the author’s wife was told telepathically from the Spirit World, by her pate Grandfather, Chief Buckeye, of the Cherokee Nation, that in order to improve Voice reception we had to use “Feedtack, (through) continuously repeated sections”. (See page 3/10) Unlike Nary’s Father, the present Chief Buckeye, who is a retired Navy Elec tronics and. Comtuter igineer and. Instructor, neither Nary nor her Grandfather, the former Chief Buckeye, knows anything of electronics • Becauze of this we can only conclude that this mthemtically sound advice came from

Physicists and/or gineers in the Spirit World. Evidently Chief Buckeye and Nary were selected as a channel because they were on the same “frequency and had communicated through the tarrier in the past. Also, the Spirits were undoubtedly aware that the author is not tash ful, and could therefore be reasonably sure the informtion would be passed on for the benefit of other researchers. And the informtion was indeed passed on to the handful of people with whom the author was corresponding at the time. Unfortunately however, it was the spring of 1979 before the potential value of this infori was recognized and. published. Before this time however, the author, in order to establish the origin of the loop feedtack principle for use in Spirit Voice Receivers, wrote to Harold Shermn and Prof. Walter Uphoff, requesting verification of the origin of this con cept. Both Sher and Prof. tJphoff were kind enough to retui dated letters over their signatures, stating the above principle had been suggested for use in i reception. (see pages .5/10 and. 5/il) From late 1976 to early 1978, the author built what, in so far as we know was the first complete, single chassis Spirit Voice Receiver, incorporating, as well as possible, the principles given to us by the Spirits up to that time. J ___ ____ FROM THE DESK OF: HAROLD SHERMAN Mountain View, Ark. 72560 October 2, 1978 Dear Bill: My correspondence shows that you sent me a full desciption of your concept of

a loop type feedback Spirit Voice Entry on May 1, 1977. I wrote you a handwritten acknowledgement of its receipt but reported that Ray Patterson was too busy, at the moment, with his lighting of Blanchard Springs Caverns, to test out your idea. I hope you are able to patent it for your own protection and that further research will prove it to be an advanced concept and of value in the tape recording of Spr±it Voices. Warmest regards ESP RESEARCH ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION 1630 Union National Plaza Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 s/u Route 1 Cregon, WI 53575 November 27, 1978 Mr. Bill Weisensale P.C. Box #b. BA.RSTCW, CA 92311 Dear Billi We have apprecIated getting your letters and. also the photo copies of letters sent to Harold Sherman and others concerning your ex and ecui developed in the area of research into the Electronic Voice Phenomenon (E1TP) as it is generally refe to these days: the recording of paranornal voices on rna tape. Cur correspondence dates back to June 5, 1975. I have apprecIated beIng kept informed of your activit±es, including your statement of your concept of a loop feedback SDIrIt VoIce Entry Circuit mailed on AprIl 22, 1977. Do keep rae informed of your progress with your patent application. Sincerely, cc: Harold Sherman Walter H. U 5/12 The Receiver Included, among other things, a built in voicebend. multifrequency (electronic white noise) carrier generator, 14’ stage loop feedbe,ck PK Modulator, with stage coupling via radio frequency electromagnetic couplings, Voice filters,

etc. (Electromagnetic couplings and. radio frequencies were in vogue at the time - the author now considers both to be of dubious value in EVP reception.) ,ch of the four stages contained a F connected to an automatic level control. Loop feed tack was controllable from zero to unity, with unity gain being usable because of the automatic level control and. RF secondary carrier. (In Dec. of 1980, Chief Buckeye indicated to us that seven is the optimum number of stages for a PK Modu lator.) € Although reception was little improved over other method.s, it became apparent € that certain principles, those given to us by the Spirits, and others, were of fun damental importance in future Spirit Voice Receiver design. The author, imagining others were right on his he which turned out not to be the case, became con cerned around this time that the sio principles of Voice reception might ‘be pat ented by someone who may retard SVR development by holding out for large suma of money. For this reason the author decided to submit a patent application on the € principles of reception which had been discerned up to that time, even though not all of the necessary principles were yet known. The first application was submitted late in 1978 and. photocopies mailed to € ! Harold Sherman, Prof Walter Uphoff, and } Davis Peck, among others. After this application was filed but before having heard from the Patent Office, the author € and. ry

wrote out, signed, and had. notarized, a document donating any patent rights which might be granted, to the ESP Research Associates Foundation under Harold. Sherman, to be used for the benefit of Humanity. As it turned out, no rights were granted and. the concepts have become unpatentable public property. The same pur pose has been served in a different way. Briefly the more important concepts described in the first application are: 1 Use of voiceband multiple frequency carriers. 2 Use of voiceband filters. 3 Use of above voice secondary carriers. 14 Use of the feedback principle in P Modulators. 5 Use of multistage PlC Modulators. 6 Use of electromagnetic couplings in PlC Modulators. 7 Use of automatic gain control to maintain PlC Modulator signal level and permit use of unity feedback. (if desired) In the spring of 1979, a second application was filed which covered use of the comparison, or differential amplifier type detector, who ‘s use was also indicated to us by Chief Buckeye. Again, when the application was filed, photocopies were mailed to Harold Sherman, Prof. Walter Uphoff, and ‘t Davis Peck, among others. In this case however, no document was submitted donating rights to the ESP Founda tion because by this time it was realized that chances of rights being granted by the Patent Office were nil, and our primary reason for filing the application was to render the concept unpatentable. Another reason for submitting these two applications was to assure that credit would. be given ---

- where credit is due ---- to Chief Buckeye, for giving to EVP researchers the basic fundamental principles of Spirit Voice Receiver design. And. to ry, who spent hours working with an glish dictionary, checking primany and secondary meanings, in order to be certain of rendering a precise translation into t 5/13 iglish from the original Cherokee in which the message was given. In 1976 when this message was received, the author considered it to be of potential importance. Today, in 1983, the author considers this message to be, by far, the most important infor VP researchers have yet received from the Spirits, in regard to Spirit Voice Receiver design. The actual statement as trans lated is: - “To gain reception, feed continuously repeated sections sudden vol ume.” Or, as we read it, “To improve reception, feedt (through) continuously repeated sections (causes a) sudden (increase in) volume (For more details see --“Feed1 circuit suggested for EVP experiments” Survival Research Foundation - “H0ThD newsletter - r - Apr 1979) The most important ‘ principles of Spirit Voice Receiver design, as presently understood, are: Principle 1 Use of a multiple frequency voice carrier. Principle 2 Use of the feed principle in the PK tx1ulator. Principle 3 Use of multiple stages (seven) in the PK bdulator. Principle Li Use of the comparison detector. Principle 5 Use of principles 1, 2, 3 and. , to create a psychokinetic test in strument which is sensitive enough to allow identification of the Psy chokinetic Sensor. A

Closer Look - - - Principle 1 Use of a multiple frequency voicebe.nd carrier. In well over 20 years of EVP research, pro 80% or more of all electronics work has been devoted to attempts to achieve Voice modulation of non-voiceband carriers. Frequencies, ranging from audio up through the electro spectrum into the visible light region (Theodor Rudolph - Lasers and Ray Patterson - light beame) had been tryed without success by the late 1970s. Today, at least some re searchers have reached the tentative conclusion that the Eli? is strictly a voice band phenomenon which simply does not happen at other frequencies. (To date, every SVR system in which it is believed Voice modulation of an a’bcve-voiceband carrier might have been obtained, has either contained a spea coupl trig within the system, between the system and the Voice recorder, or has used an analog Voice recorder, --- or both. The advanced ? 4, which has probably yield ed the best Eli? reception to date, --- has all three. Supporting this conclusion is the fact that, to the author’s knowledge, non mediumistic, and. until proven otherwise, even mediumistic, moduãation of a single frequency carrier, even within the voiceband, has never been obtained. Also, in normei. AM modulation, the lowest frequency in the 3ignal being 4ulated must be, or should be, double the highest frequency in the modulating signal. For reasons we do not yet fully understand, this rule does not apply in VP reception. Because of the above two factors

it has become apparent that although Eli? re ception is AN in nature, it is not simple amplitude modulation in the ordinary sence of the term. Another factor, not yet fully understood, is present. This factor see to be a resonance effect between the P signal and the carrier. That I -H IlK 1001< U N 1? F G. HI PASS’ I ±I ç I on — CD ÷rv L0 ncs K Hz — SPIRIT VO1C fl1!C B mental liodulo VoicE FILTER REF. BY/))1 IN .0! 3 “K 300 H _ Il .00I F! LT El? I —fI2V 5/15 Is, only frequencies which are already present In the carrier, which correspond to frequencies in the PK signal, are given an extra push in amplitude. thilike ordinary AN modulation, the modulating signal (pic) does not appear to create fre quencies in the carrier which do not already exist in the carrier. Because of this resonance or RAN effect, (Resonance Amplitude ?‘bdulation) the carrier must be voiceband and. must contain a number of suitable frequencies, or Voice reception simply does not happen. In 1977-’78, when the use of a multilrequency carrier (electronic white noise) was first suggested by the author, it seemed to ny that it was completely con trary to what we were trying to do. The usual question at that time was: “But we are trying to get rid, of noise, aren’t we? --- are you adding more?” And. of course, the “why was completely unexplainable in non-technical ter Since

the author is not an EVP medium, he was unable to prove the validity of this principle. Recently however, through the diligent work of William O who is an EV? me dium, the importance and necessity of the inultifrequency voiceband carrier has been independently verified. t of the multifrequency voiceband carrier is: 1) Recommended to us by the Spirits, 2) Logical, 3) Electronically valid, and. L independently experimen tally verified. Principle 2 Use of the feed principle in the Psychokinetic dulator. Because psychokinetic energy is a very subtle force, and/or because the effect in the PK active element we are seeking is very weak, the Spirits, through iief Buckeye, have recommended the use of three different techniques to increase the percentage of Voice modulation. The first of these is the feedba.ck principle. In 1977 the author, with the help of an EC-4000 programeble calculator, set out to determine just why ief Buckeye had recommended the use of feed in SYR design. Assuming a Voice modulation of 1% and rm’n progra for various percentages of feedback, it soon became apparent there was an appreciable amount of increase in the oercentage of any Voice modulation that appears within the feed back loop. It further became apparent that this increase in modulation percentage lay along a log curve rather than being linear, and that because of this the best (usable) effect appeared just under the point at which signal distortion begins at unity feedback. signal distortion Best usable modulation per dulation centage amplification

region percentage increase 0 - 100% Feedback percent Geri. +12 V 276- 220K i. 122 1K .luf Amp. Amp. 1K 3db drop 1K .1 uf Limiter 1’I 276 1122 1K 100 ohm 300Hz - 3KHZ Filter unreg. 1 uf +1 2V .luf ‘0 tI .001 U out SPIflIT VOICE RECEIVER Experi men tat. Module Carrier Generator Ref. Y Date .5/17 Recently, through the brilliant work of William 0 ‘Neil with the advanced version of the .rk 4, we now have independent experinental verification of the importance of the feed principle in Spirit Voice Receiver design. Use of the feed principle is: 1) Recommended to us by the Spirits, 2) logical, 3) the sound, 4) Electronically valid, and, 5) independent ly experi tally verified. Principle 3 Use of fltiple stages (seven) in the Psychokinetic dulator. In 1976, when we were told to use “-V--. continuously repeated sections ---“, we were not told, what kind of stages to use nor how ny. However, the advan tages of using more than one stage in the PK ) was instantly apparent. In ordinary radio signal modulation, we never think in ter of using more than a single modulation stage, since the modulating signal can easily be pre amplified to any degree necessary in order to achieve the desired percentage of modulation in a single step. In EVP reception, however, such is not the case. Here the modulating PX signal and/or the PK Sensor in which modulation actually takes place, is very weak. For this

reason the percentage of Voice modulation which occurs in a single stage is grossly inadequate for clear Voice reception. Because of this the Spirits have recommended we use a series of identical mod.u lation stages rather than just one. stage H stage H stage {ta - Stage modulation X% percentage Total modulation 1X% 2X% 3X% - L • • percentage Initially, how n stages should be used was unknown. Then in March 1977, the author’s younger Brother, who has been in the Spirit World since he was 19, indicated to us that seven is the correct number. Later, in a vision during December 1980, Chief Buckeye showed Mary what appeared to be a sophisticated Spirit Voice Receiver of the future, from which the top of the cabinet had been removed. Inside was a largeish PC board containing a myriad of electronic components. Mary’s attention was drawn to a series of 7 hoop shaped components which were predominate in the certer of the board, and it was emphasized to her by Chief Buckeye, that seven is the correct number. (Mary and the author worked for some time over a period of several days to sketch these components while her memory was still fresh. The components 1 no resemblance whatsoever, to any electronic components with which the author is familiar. The sketchs will be reproduced in a future issue.) From a theory standpoint, the more modulation stages used, the better. If for example, we receive a modulation of 1% which would be

inaudible against a multi- frequency carrier in a single stage, we could, in theory, increase this to 50% modu lation by using 50 stages. In actual practice however, the signal would simply come “unglued” in this .ny stages. That is, phase, harmonic, and other d!stor t±on would nullify any benefit derived from using such a large number. (Which is one of the reasons why care jst be taken to prevent the for of harmonics 5/18 and other distortion within the PK dulator.) The problem then is to select the best compromise between efficiency and. distortion, --- and the Spirits say the best compromise is seven. Although we do not yet have independent verification of the importance of this princi nevertheless the principle Is: 1). Recommended to us by the Spirits. 2) Logical, 3) Mathemtically sound, and +) Electronically valid. Principle Use of the Differential Amplifier Detector. Late in 1978, the author, wrestling with the problem of eliminating the voice nd carrier after Voice modulation had occured, conceived the idea of using a dif ferential amplifier to compare the two channels of a stereo recording on olayt after having first recorded through an experimental PK Modulator on one channel and through a patthcord, directly from the carrier source, on ‘the other channel. (see page Ll./ii, L Although at the time the author believed this concept to be his own, it now ap in light of later developments, that the concept originated in the Spirit World and was simply channeled through the

author’s subconscious. During the course of experimentation, which was not working out very well be cause of distortion induced by the recording and. playbo.ck process, 1ary, who had. been observing from the sofa, suddenly became glassy eyed and stared at the oppo site wall as if she were looking into another World, --- which indeed she was. ‘ she “returned”, she told the author her Grandfather (Chief Buckeye) was pre sent and he had told her the author should put the “thing” he was working with, “there”, indicating a position between the microphone and recorder. The “thing” being worked with ‘was a .ttery powered differential amplifier built on a bread board. After consideration, it was realized Chief Buckeye was indicating the duff. amp. detector should be an intrinsic part of Spirit Voice Reciever design. The princIple is: 1) Recommended to us by the Spirits, 2) Logical, 3) .th e sound, and. ) Electronically valid. Principle 5 Use of princioles 1, 2, 3 and L is necessary to create- a psychokinet 13 test instr which is sensitive enough to allow identification of the Psycho kinetic Sensor. “To gain reception, feedback continuously repeated sections sudden volume.” This single statement directly tells us only two things, to use feedback and. to use re than one stage in the P Modulator, ‘out by i it tells u a. great deal more. Some of these implicatIons are obvious, others more subtle. The Implications. 1 The first and most obvious of these implicatIons iS that it

Is we who have to supply the carrier, --- otherwise what would we feed through repeated sectIons? 2 The second imolication Is that the P active element acts as a PK Modulator rather than as a ? Transducer. If the statement had said only to use “continuous ly repeated sections”, then we might suppose they could be connected either in par allel In order to Improve the amplitude of the received signal (?), in whIch case the active elements would ‘Ce PK Transducers, or connected in series to Improve the oercentage of carrier modulation, In which case the active elements would act as PK Modulators. However, the fIrst word of the statement, “feedback (through)”, 5/19 leaves no room for doubt as to how the stages are to be connected, nor aiiy room for doubt as to what kind of effect occurs in the psychokinetically active element, -- modulation. 3 The third implication is that the PK active element is weak, ---- with a cap ital “W”. Otherwise the Spirits would not have recommended the incorporation of not one, but two different methods, and ater yet a third, the comparison detector, for increasing the percentage of modulation. L The fourth implication, related to the third, is that Voice clarification is difficult. This is a fact that anyone who has worked in EVP electronics for any length of time, hardly needs to be told. But what the implication is here, is not that it is difficult to find a relatively simple way

to clarify reception, but rather that there is no simple way That is, there simply is no easy “quick fix”, single stage, “crystal set” kind of solution possible, and that the only way it can be done is to use all three techniques recommended by the Spirits, in order to brin the modulation percentage or Voice/carrier ratio, the E equivalent of sig nal/noise ratio, up to clarification level. It is hardly likely that the Spirits, who in the past have constantly demonstrated an interest in improving reception, would recommend complicated circuitry, if there were an easier method possible. 5 The fifth implication, which was only realized by the author within the past 18 month, is that it is necessary to use the first four principles in order to build a test instrii Which is sensitive enough to psychokinetic energy in order to allow us to identify the psychokinetically active element when, by trial and error experimentation, we place seven of such an element into the test instrument. (up until this time the author was still using simple single stage test setups.) If we assi a value of 15% to the identity of the PK Sensor, then we can say the Spirits have already told us 85% of what we need to know in order to build an efficient Spirit Voice Receiver that will work for everyone. But what is even more important, at this point in time, is that they have already given us 100 percent of the information we

need in order to build a psychokinetic test instrument which is sensitive enough to identify the PR Sensor. The gineer of today has at his disposal an astonishing variety of test equipment, ranging from simple multirneters costing a few dollars, to quadruple trace oscilloscopes costing several thousand, to super powerful computers and. spe ciallized equipment costing tens of thousands of dollars. Yet, not one of these instruments is sensitive to psychokinetic energy The igineer, or for that mat ter, anyone working in EVP electronics, is like a carpenter without a hammer, or a mechanic without a wrench. The Spirits the have given us the “wrench” we need, ---- they have described to us how to build. an instrument which is so super-sensitive to PR en ergy that it will, ---- if we use it ---- allow us to identify the missing PR Sen sor. INCREASING SVR SENSITIVITY 5/20 1 Single stage P Modulator, no feed no detector The SVR - “Crystal Set” - Least PK sensitive 2 :1 __________ _______ single j JAF • stage ___ t•j..•••• t Single stage PK 1lodulator witS feed no detector More PK sensitive 4gI •..,. , A Multistage (7) PK Modulator with feed no detector Higher PX sensitivity • I • * • • I I • I I I • I I I ___ • I 1 ____ ___ Gen __________________ seven : ________ AF ______ stage _________ Amp —.--Diff Multistage PX Modulator with feedback compaiison detector Highly ?K sensitive 5/21 Modulate —

don ‘ t mix ___________________I seven Gen J ___ • Diff Amp Multistage PK Modulator with feedback. Differwtial amplifier incor porated in feedback loop to eliminate carrier and feedback only the Voice signal. The SVR “Superheterodyne -- Highest PK sensitivity (Incorporation of the differential amplifier within the feedback loop of The PK Modulator was recently suggested by Mr Dave Lloyd, Industrial Technology Engineer.) Notes: 1 Although probably not actually necessary in an SVR test instrument, in more sophisticated Spirit Voice Receivers, an auto level control, as described in the author’s 1978 patent application, will most probably be necessary to maintain signal level in the PK Modulator at unity gain, or at the optimum point just be low unity gain, depending upon the ultimate type of carrier used. and. precise cir cult design. 2 Although the PK Modulator block diagram, as recommended by Chief Buckeye, appears to be intended for use at audio frequencies, it could be designed for and. used in any other frequency range up to and including visible light, by using appropriate stage circuits and. interstage couplings, etc. APPLICATION As mentioned previously, it is all but certain the PK Sensor will not be identified unless experimental SVR syste are made much more sensitive to PK en ergy than they are today. In well over 20 years of experimentation, there have been hundreds of thousands of experiments which used PK Sensors, in fact every ex periment in which Voices were recorded made use of such PK active elements, and,

yet to this day, we do not know the identity of this element In light of the above it is apparent that The PK Sensor is operating below the threshold of sensitivity of our experimental SVR systerr As an examole, one of the hypotheses proposed by ? is to test a laser activated quartz cry stal for PK activity. The author has never worked with such crystals and has not the slightest idea as to whether or not they are PX active. However, it is a rea sonable possibility, so just for the sake of discussion let us say such a crystal is in fact PK active. If the researcher sets up this experirneit with a single stage PK Modulator, without feedback or detector, reception is very likely to be no better, pe not as good as with other systen And the experimenter, after a diligent amount 0 5/22 of exveri with different carrier levels, different crystals, different excitation levels, etc., y be forced to the conclusion that such crystals are not PK active, when in fact the real problem is that the activity level is sinvly below the sensitivity thresholt of the “crystal set” SYR system in which the ele ment was placed for testing. the other hand, if the researcher places seven such crystals in a highly P sensitive SVR “superfieterodyne” arran.ge ---- as recommended by the Spirits and the crystals are actually P active, then reception, although pe not coniletely clear, will nevertheless improve so suddenly and

so d.ra. that the experimenter cannot fail to identify the crystals as P active. Conversely, if in such a super PK sensitive arrangement there is no improvement in Voice qual ity, then the researcher can safely and per conclude such crystals are not P active, cross them off the list and go on to what he considers to be the next 6 most likely possibility. TIlE PSYCHOI SENSOR Like a jigsaw puzzel with but one piece missing, we lack only the identity of the PlC Sensor in building the first efficient Spirit Voice Receivers. Since there are pro less than a dozen or a dozen and a half plausible possibilities, and since the Spirits, through Chief Buckeye, have told, us e what to use as a test instrument, it should not be many more month before we ow for certain what the PlC active element is. Each electronics researcher who has worked on the problem for any length of 4 time, probably has compiled a list of what he considers to be the most likely PlC activity candidates, based on the analysis of available EVP infor logic, infor from the Spirits, intuition, and the for of hypotheses. The following is the author’s prime candidate list. It is presented here as a ,tter of curiosity for our readers, and is not to be taken as a recommendation that 4 others work on the same possibilities, although of course, others are welcome to do so if they wish. 4 No attempt will

be mde at this point to explain the rationale behind this 4 list as it would require .ny more pages. It might be noted however, that all the possible effects on this list are found in speaker/microphone couplings and in * recorder tape head/ tape couplings. (record mode) Probability List A ?sychokinetically Caused Change In t 1, The resistance of metal (or what might be called a possIble “Un Geller ‘fect”) Test device --- Wire wound resistors or SpecIal Device (#1) consisting of resistive wire enclosed in coil with excitation signal similar to bias sig- t nal used in tape recording process. Sddy currents 2 t Test device --- coil with solid metal core, --- or Special Device j I 3 Electro field strength (Audio frequency only) Test device --- electro interstage couplings t e p 5/23 gnetic field strength Test device Hall generators S Eaectroma field interaction Test device --- Special Device (#2) - non-acoustic “speaker/microphone coupling’ consisting of coil in gnetic field with coil mechanically attached to crystal microphone element A Point To Ponder Spirit Voice reception happens, -- precisely how it happens, and precisely where it happens, -- is not subject to i by assumptions, pet hypoth eses, preferences, or preconceptions. Experimental SVR Test Instrument power p Note - All circuits are experimental and subject to upgrade modification at any time. Address List - EVP Research Organizations American Association - Electronic Voice Phenomena 726 DiU Road Sevei Park, 1 211k6 TAscience Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 7L Franklin,

N.C. 2873 Life- Beyond- Death Research Foundation, Inc P.O. Box 737 Franklin, NC 2873 Organizations Interested in E Research ESP Research Associates Foundation Suite 1630, Union National Plaza Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 S/2L New Frontiers Center Fellowship Fars, Rt. 1 Oregon, Wisconsin 53575 Mind Science Found.ation 102 W Rector Street San Antonio, Texas 78216 EVP Newsletters AA-EVP NEWS Prime.ri_ly general interest, some technical. Published Quarterly American Association - Electronic Voice Phenomena J HORIZONS Published quarterly Life Beyond Death Research Foundation, Inc The Spirit Voice Pri technical, some general interest. Published as time pernits, Quarterly goal T SPIRIT VOICE is edited and published by Lll Weisensale, Box # B.Q., Barstow, CA 92311, as a service to all who are interested in Electronic Voice Phenomena. Your hypotheses, opinions, viewpoints and comments are invited. Any statements printed in The Spirit Voice are open for discussion. Although the editor is cur rently a member of the ESP Research Associates Foundation, The American Associa tion - Electronic Voice Phenomena, and the Life Beyond Death Research Found.ation, the editor’s opinions are strictly his own, and under no circui are to be taken as representing the viewpoints of any of the above, or of any other Organ ization. S ! ~ '3 8 1 l 'A~"\ j 7. ;~ A T ronsCommunicotlon T echnicnl letter· Number to \ of' ~ . ~ o:J .:4 ;:.: '::. Co ! - !, f Bill Heisensole November 1991 /vv\rvViJ\J\/vl./\JV\f\r~J\.nJlj\fVl.JVl/\.tli\ +++++tbt'oUgbcoutinuousll1 t't·ptatcb staflt.g COMMENT It seems a poradox wben we speak

of individual having excellent reception and an speak of prominent receiving sgstems and at one and time, sag the ,eception problem hos not been solved. So it would be those who a,e app,op,iate, relativel" nem to elan'" this situation as well as possible. this field, the same especiall'l for to the presence of IMs thefe are As most alread" know, Transmediums, -- and then there are the lest ot us. W,", thefe is bettel quolitq leeeption in is still a matter of debate. Some of the possible reosons ole: 1) Theg have tried houie., n Jheg are more l) Theg have bighlg developed spiritualh,. is 0 better equipment. 5) It is the talent lite pla'ling result of a Hlie qeneticalllJ caused chemical bolance of the bloin, the result of interests and abilities developed in post Lives, 7) The Spi,its have selected onl'l certain individuals to communicate with, 8) Etc., Etc. list could go on and on, so toke ~our The choice 01 think up qoul own leason. 4) T lansmediumship the piano, 6) It is some equipment. used bg a T lonsmedium, do not qet the some quolitlJ leception. ARothet of the above that does not appeol to be true that the Spilits have selected onlg certain is individuals with which to communicate. In so fal as in known, re is open to an'lone who has the patience Gnd presistence to leorn how to perceive and understand what is reeeived. in faith the slJStem Jhe most plominent, best known recelVln4J

become plOminent sljstems have because thelj hove wOlked exceptionalllJ well. the catch is, thelj have wOlked well onl" But the s'Jstem. the pelson who assembled fOf ADd in each ond evelIJ case this pelson was a verg stlonq Ilansmedium who had a great deal themselves hod of built. Although tbis malj hove occulled, I do not personall" know 01 any instance in which ang of these s'lstems has been of significant benetit the pe,son(s) (If (lnq of our leaders who built the system. know of on" such instance. J would appieciate know;nq about it.) Because these s~stems, no mattel how well the" have wOlked, have not been 01 benefit to other ieseorchels, the~ OlE! cueiositi~s, not solutions. to anIJone other the" than Two of the above which ole not hue is that Tfonsmediums have tried harder and that thelJ have better equipment There ore some who ole not TMs who have tlied much hOldel than the great mojofitq ot Itis have ever had to trll, and have never hod even close to the some (eception qualittj. And nOD-mediums IJsinq tljpe, sometimes· the verlj the some When we speak of reception quolit'l in Ie ieseOlch we are speaking terms. teHible siqnol to noise eotio, the Because of voices which we consider of excellent qualitlJ in Ie. in onlJ othel oeea of audio work would be considered is s({onq_ IMs, with one possible that even Another problem ·owful-. relative in to understand what of to recold and plaq bock in exception, have

Even order tbouqh better, mo.e is undeutondoble quolitg for the TH. thelj can no more COIfIj on a reasonable. nOlmoj radio 01 the Spirit tqpe convelsotion with telephone reception said. is than World The bottom the rest of us can. line is that the reception plOblem has not been solved for either non-medium or Iransmedium, receiving and equipment lemains ocute. fo. more efficient the need I ""1 """1 Tlanslation bq courtesq of He Hans Heckmann June 18. ",. TRAHSlATlOH FROM COMMUHICATIOH SYSTEMS. Volt Ho. l 1"1 -TRAttSKOHHUHIKAJIOH- JOURHAl FOR PSYCHO BIOPHYSICS Atm IHTERDlMEHSIOttAL Overview of equipment setup for direct T.C. Co.tocts btJ Emst Senkowsld Mon., readers have requested technical details of the (lfronCJement of equipment used in direct T.C. contacts. We sholl gladlq oblige bq publishing the basic equipment setups and bll giving a short Fu.ther detail$ can be found ;n m'f book -lnsttumentaU'f Assirted description ot each r~up. Communication-. Although the builders achieved good ond at times unusual results with these s'fstems there con be no assurance that other experimentels will qet similar lesults. It is quite likelq that strong personal the hiqhl" unusual equipment functions ond o.e not impoftant parl contributions plOIl an necessorilg transteroble. in Receiving 5qstem of Haerting, Germang 1981 The outputs of up to 7 receivers covering different flequencg bonds are connected to each other eithel acousticall" 01 eJecteicall'l. Also 1 a tuneable ULf antenna Qnd IR .adiato.s were used but were not di.ectl" connected. The voice ot ABX JUnO came directl'l via loudspeaker. (

INFRARED ® LAMPS ® BROADBAND RECEIVER. 4 ~ RECEIVER 2 SW 7.3 MHZ FM 108 MHZ ANTENNA PSYCHOFON iF 2 GENERATOR MIXER RECORDER AMPLIFIER RECEIVER 1 EUROSIGNA FM 88 l-lliZ RECEIVING SYSTEM HAERTING, GERMANY 18 - l RECORDER _ ~ SPIRICOM STEP II O/NEIL ltETASCIENCE USA . - - - - - - - , l"I'IipoJ -----rl-P I _ SOUNDFIELD t-tt----t I 1\ ELECTRCMAGN. I 'I' L . f - - - - - FIELD CASSETTE PLAYBACK 13 TONES GENERATOR XMITTER FM 91 MHZ RECEIVER FM 91 MHZ Spificom Step II - O"Heil/Metoscience USA 1'82 B tones ot 0 cassette ploqback modulote the 91 MHz FM cOfl;ef of Q genefoto,/tfonsmittef. The uonsmitted signal is received and demodulo(ed aCfOSS the room bl) a FM feceivef and beamed out It is piclced up bl) a mic,ophone ond fed ogain to the ,. bq two loudspeokefs OCtOSS The main cossette recorder also MHz qenefator/tfonsmitter (ecOfds the enti,e sound mixtule. With this setup aneif cOllied on applox. 28 hoUis of dialogue with the depofted scientist Of. !;eorCJe J. Nuellel. forming a the foom. feedback thereblJ loop. RECORDE )II ...... -----+I-~ SOUNDFIELD .... - __ + _ r-------j I I '" '- ELECTRCliAGN. I FIELD __ _____ -.J SPIRICCM STEP 1 O/NEIL META SCIENCE USA CASSETTE PLAYBACK .. XMITTER ~ 13 TONES AM 29 MHZ GENERATOR RECEIVER AM 29 MHZ Spificom Step I - O"tteiVMefoscieRce USA 1988 n tones between B1 ond 781 Hz Ofe modulotinq the 2' MHz AM couiel of <jenefotof 11. a

small tfonsmittef of the tqpe used tOf wifeless microphones. The transmitted signal is being feceived and demodulated btl (I fec:e;vef OCIOSS the foom whose loudspeakers beam out the siqnal to the pickup microphone of a cassette fecorde(. 111 - J .. - ..... - - - --- VHF FIELD XICROPHONE . RECEIVER 2 VHF 37.5 MHZ GENERATOR 2 VHF 37.5 MHZ STEREO RECORDER GENERATOR 1 INFRA-RED 6*:lJAm --- ~ .. -- ---- .. .v.:= RECEIVER 1 INFRA-RED 6 * =lJ1m t - - -..... AMPLIFIER INFRARED FIELDS LOUDSPEAKER INFRARED SYSTEM, KOENIG, GERMANY Intlo-red Generator Sqstem - Koenig. German., "87 Infra-led silJnals of genetator 1 ale sent out across the loom to III le~eiver II whele theg are demodulated. The result of this demodulation then modulates the 17.5 MHz caflier of UHf qenelato, the room and piclced up bq receiver Il. The 17.5 MHz Il. demodulation then feeds bcack into genelatol II fOlming a feedback loop. the second output of receiver II provides amplification fOI the voices and feeds a stereo tope recorder. radiated across The ~a"ier is ( { S!EREO RECORDER STEP 2 ,~ EM-FIELD US MICROr ... _~-- US S ~R '1 r .. " ~ STEPl ULTRASOUND FIELD (.j- - -- GEN. l~EN. 2;GEN. 3 20 KHZ I 32 KHZ t 29 KHZ E WAV1 SQ t ~ ~ MIXER 1 ~ MIXER 2 " I KHZ , GEN .. 4 GEN. 5 'GEN. 6 20 .. 80120 .. 40 lao .. 20 KHZ t t t WARBLEGENERATOR

I KHZ I . - I I Ultla Sound Genefotol S.,stem - Koenig, Gelmang 1'85 The siqnals of squale wave generators 1-2-3 ole mixed bq mixer 1. Mixer l fUlther mixes these signals with the flequencg modulated outputs of qenelators 4-5-'. The lesultinq mixtule is paltJlJ audible because of the beat frequencies and modulating warble tones. Beaminq it across the room for demodulation and rec:ordinq is o~complishecl bq on Ultra Sound speaker (Step 1) or antenna (Step Z). 18 - 4 ANrENNAE DIODE 1 BROADBAND ----..... --_ .... Z. I I I GENERATOR AM-FM 30 MHZ RECEIVER FM 90 MHZ LOUD SPEAKER DIODE 2 BROADBAND GENERATOR SQUARE VIA KHZ RANGE '--___ ~~ MICROPHONES d-----.l' ... RECORDER GA-l SYSTEM HARSCH-F. LUXEMBOURG - GA-l S"stem. Horst::b. LuxemboUffJ 1"1 The antenna of a SW/FM receiver is connected to Z diode circuits and the output of modulated l-watj conversations witb genelator (Tronslotor). diredlCJ audible voices were possible. O~easionalllJ a square wave generator is used. ANTENNAE RECEIVER 1 RECEIVER 2 FM 88 MHZ FM 88 MHZ RECEIVER 3 TV SET UHF 640 MHZ LOUDSPEAKERS (366 nm)@---<§) 0 UVLAMP FLUORESCE~ LAMP GENERATOR SQUARE WA1j~ KHZ RAN:;E MICROPHONE q EOROSIGNAL BRIDGE HARSCH-F. BLINKING 8 LAMP RATE 1/see 1 RECORDER I LUXEMBOURG luxembourg. 1986 incandescent blinking Eurosiqnol Bridqe. H«Iuch. Two Short Wave/fM receivers and () B/W TV together with two UU lamps, a fluorescent lamp p'us the stjstem. OccosionoUII 0 square wave generator is one Jhe TV set opelotes on a added. free channel near 478 MHz. Jhe

voices tcom the radio sets could be heard directl" ond recorded blJ .lIj~,ophoRe. tuned near the EUROSIGHAL (88 MHz). The radio receivers are lamp make up 18 - ~ , UIOIIIu/A14 .. 1.IIlID9,m (llUllf.WJ.tfLJ .. Ul!lIHI~~m SENI{m~slcr APRI!. 87 • cr.. BATTER V PoWER 1m fLU OR ESC £tl'L' I.AM I! + ] NC!JUIDESUEWL' TiLlmaN" i'1illIIlIJ: ABOUt' LAMP ,. - , - --, 1, .. t~(1 I 111:111 :.JI~:U (!: ).i[' . ". r" ItSC/oll..J. ... ...".L . ·~V.slr. ".'Gs, il..~/~041,11(: G!;,Ov. , ( ~ ~..;;--.- ill/;. ·,'1 IZ I 641CIWI'UOUI:l (HAND-HELD DUUI1Hi COlJUlHlICATIOU) SQUARE--WAVE PIELD-GENElUTOR (ABOUT 5 kHz) I i.· I~ I .IT ' B cOlll l !~~~~EJ~ ~ \.L:-~ra _ FIvl-RECEIIJER 2 t:8l.J~ 'V!k:'1/j ,.Jc IOu", (82 - 1 04 MH~) 86 - FlQ} 87 MHz f ----- -- .'J r-V- ~ ~ rUlDA ,- ,.. - -=-- t:::2F-1---- ~ ADDITIonAL: ELECTRIC TORG" SHINING FROU OPPOSITE SIDE OF ROOM ONTO SHELF WITH PM - RECEIVERS 1 + 2 PM - RECEIVER IN ROOM 2· LOW-FREQUENCY AMPLIFIER TO CA3!)ETTE REGOfilJEII (PlIILIPS D 6920) AC POI'IER DISTRIBUTOR uv LArIl' 2 Jq6 nm 'BLACK-WHITE TV RECEIVER TUNED OFJ.i' STATIONS .AROUND 470 " HARSCH-ASCffBACH ", ftota de ThIonwIII .. 409 R!87 HESPERANGE Or.nd-Duch6 de luxembourg T6I.: 36 D4 33 J I ~ .D£.cK If'eCOIU>IN~ I .~ 'f1lO··~¥ SrsrE-W GA-I SC!llmr.T Ie - TiJ~LIlH/ij SEIiKO',i:J.>1 - uaIL iJ7 -.---- --------- LAST UIlAlIGE: DASHED LINES /. ./,/r y ,? r . • • • • • • • • • • • • \

I I , I I I \.. I' I \ U 11/ ' ~-~,.Al - ! A I , I I ~ I ,~.;,... .... , ,2.:: ~::.~t~ ~.l:~O~~EC~~Ptr.~~ . t'LlI(ilii~JI.:E:J'r HrJP I ~-.~~;;:" ',., .,~" '\ ~ -, .. -~ -~=-~~i \ I CJ •.. 1. ~I3C\i ~ ..... , II 0 I'" 'V - .• L- It It ~ .lJ}J ' II' J , -~ 11- -.~--= . .....,.,. 220 V 15 \V '::-... , , lin !'!.2.~ ~. ,-, ~ ' I _ FH ". II .• - flO! 'IS • .. - : . --- f'HILIi'S --~.- - ~- ;~:rR"e~L"""'B ~~ItA / r \_~~; '~F"-III-e:-'-BA': .... ·~D~·-~p'c------ ~ CERClf D'EJUDES ,$U~ LA TRANSCOIIIIUNIC41'IO ........ ..... , LUlIElIBOURQ ... ,"'pc ........ ADDITIOIIAL: PM-RECEIVER IN ROOM 2 OP'l'IOIlAL: FIELD-GENERATOR OP ESB (HAlID- HELD) TUN8D TO ONB OP THREE SPECIAL ~-- FREQUENCIES AROUND 9011Hz................ ~,.. TWO DIODE CIRCUITS ,UTH SPECIAL ANTgRRAS MICROPHONE /1 // ,~. H HIGH-FREQUENCY OUT y/ OF TRANSLATOR /~ . ~LENQTH 2.6M .~ ........ ~_ . -_ .. __ ..... =='"""--~-~-' qU,4RTZCR'tSTA L :>-6 cr.1 DL)'J' ~II:C I~ !<'!iOM UECJ::I vl!n - (110'1/ flun 'ril~1l 10 BE TOih!lllm) ~ / \ •... , ~~gu~~5~ \ TUAUSLATOil 25-30 t.'ilIz CS TEST-OSCILL. AU-FM MODUL. 100 mW/9 V = SPECIA.L ANTENNA - (1N191) SH1ELDED -- - -L CABLE I SHIELDIRG lkOO I r.OB!AINER r-I 1- - I • I 1 L ____ J DIODE-CIRCUIT -ca """ l E S B I- r- G A 1 L ex' ] FL!-REC~IVER

TkAllSLATOR 11k 1101t ~2 'r,s-1oprr • I:_.I~' -",,' CC~~ fEll/uTE 6mm 8) 6TU/h"S C3 0.Smml l.l n f6 1 02 4"J}£~~W- auo-1l aY"ALc. HlcaOPI/ONE T 1 · .... ·1 1 - BelUe' l.N~OB Romi 1 ROOM 2 30 End of ~r~n~13~ion bY Hans HeckMann IJS All of gra"t i "tude 1:0 available. h<ere "th<e in Dr Senkowsk i English and Mr speaking ~orld, owe a HeckMann for ",aking "this deb~ 0 f Ma"terial ( ~HALVSIS I n "the se"t da!:>,s c rys"ta I "there were hundreds rad i 0 associa1:ed cireui~s, an~enna 0 f differen~ de"tee~or, a~plifier and .c oMb i na1: i ons ~hereo f, e1:c., dev i sed by dozens 0 f arrangeMen1:s and tiMe wen1: on, 1:he More efficient of these were As radio pioneers. Modern developed, fur"ther far be!:>,ond what eOMMuniea1:ion ear I!:>' in "the i r wi I dest dreaMs. In re1:rospect, even ~hough SOMe of 1:hese earl!:>' s!:>'steMs Ma!:>, have been in "their da!:>,. we now see 1:heM as onl!:>' of considered the "uI"til<'la1:e" in a s~ate his1:orical in~erest. of flux, and in reali1:!:>' 1:here was no such thing as a "finished" or "final" systeM. S!:>'s"tel<'ls which ~oday are i Mag i ned In these earl!:>' da!:>'s everything was rad i 0 aMa"teurs e ou I d have incorpora:ted even"tuallY s!:>,steMs. and in 0 f To day, se1:" da!:>,s eo x per i en c in 9 i n T ran s C 0 MMU n i eat ion 1 -to be "toMorrow"s his1:or!:>'.

1: h e ..... e are a 9 a i n "e rys1:a I in !,Ie1: ano1:her fie I d 0 f c OMMun i e a~ i on. And aga i n ..... e see a state of flux in which ~he "ul~iMa1:e" s!:,ls1:eMS of "toda!:,l are To go back 1:0 our analogy of a des1:ined i 1:"s own is fo 11 owi ng cleve I opMen1: Moun1:a in, eae h individual developMen1: "trail up "the side of "the Moun"tain. AI1:hou9h the bes1: known and these SYS1:eMS represent MOSt (but not all) 0 f MOS1: proMi nen1:, and a 1 though SOMe have progressed sOMewha1: fur1:her respee t i ve trai Is than others, bee ause none (that I know up le"t Of) have been of Signifiean1: benefi1: even 1:0 o1:her researchers, alone 1:he general public, none have progressed 1:0 an!:>'where near the 1:op of the i.e., anywhere near 1:he efficien1:, universal syS1:eM that Moun1:ain, is so sorely needed for "the enlightenMent Of HUManity. 0 f 1:hese sys1:e .... s the i r £-,"- '-.: A lthough none 0 f far frOM i1:. Again, the dese r i bed systeMS has proven to be 0 f universal benefit, and therefore none are likelY 1:0 be anywhere near the beS1: sys"te .... pOSSible, this does no"t Mean the!:>, are wi"thou1: value, in 1:he earlY days of radio, aMong 1:he M!:>'riad ~-, _.Agura"tions, "there were cer1:ain COMMon denoMina1:orS Which were of fur1:her developed and benefi 1: and which were in More

SOPhis1:ica1:ed designs. l"t behooves us "theM to look very closely at exis"ting s!:>,s1:eMs ~o see i f "there are any such denoMina"tors whiCh Might possibly be of universal benefit, and "therefore warrant More (For purpose of 1:his discussion i t is extensive experiMen1:a1:ion. cons i dered "that there are 3 Koen i g step 1, s"tep 2, and infrared) incorpora1:ed S!:,lS~eMS, 1) 188% '-, 2) 3) 4) 50% 56% SOX 18 - a 50% S6% 38% 25% 25% Use of one or More radio receivers A) B) C) D) [) Use of radio "transMi"t1:er Use of speaker/MicroPhone coupling "to voice recorder Use of audio carrier genera1:ors Use of single receiver Use of 2 or More r~eivers Use of AM receiver onl!:>' Use of FM receiver onlY Use Of bo~h AM and rM receivers S) 6) 7) 8) 25% 25% 25% 25% Use Of Multitone voiceband Use of ultrasound (harMonics partly aUdible) 25% 25% A) B) Use of feedback principle Use of square wave generator Use of TV receiver Use of lighting effects Used in one systeM only I f a device/circuit/configuration, etc., is used in onlY one systeM, it could Mean one of two things. Either it is unnecessary. or the person who bui I t the S!.IsteM knows SOMething the res"t of us don't. So it is interesting to take a closer look at these single arrangeMents: i) 2) Use Of acoustic coupling within the feedback loop. Use of direct feedback Of the would cause used in the effiCient.

above the acoustic conSiderably More Koenig systeM. It coupling distortion seeMS the used in the O'Neil systeM than feedbac k latter should be far More 1:he d i rec t 3) Use of two in-series stages The SysteM stages" as reCOMMended frOM "the Spirit world. is a step in two stage series arrangeMent used in 1:he Koenig infrared repeated the d i rec 1: i on 0 f: --"c ont i nuous I y MOdifications in but have goes), one or Thanks 1:0 "the!,l are now con figured I)r Senkowsk i , we have no1: on I y diagraMs 0 f (as far up 1:0 date as also these th i s S!,Is1:eMs as we earlier inforMation addition For these S!,lsteMs we have configurations on three of these systeMS. in tiMe showing Modi fications Made as each in effect, "snapShots" it's own two S!,lsteM Made I know, particular t,rail of developMent. none of result of blind COMparison experiMents, we canno1: discoun1: 1:he that all of these people are/were very experienced. and we can aSSUMe. would not have Made such Modifications unless the!,l believed there was very gOOd reason to dO SO. We shOU I d there fore pa!,l spec i a I attent i on to talented and experienced exactl!,l what Modifications people Made the quality of (four Modifications are conSidered here: OiNeil 1-2. recep1:ion. Koenig 1-2. Koenig 2-3. and Harsch 1-2) these Modifications was Made in so far as the AlthOUgh, as to their S!,lS1:eMS advances along in order

to these ver!,l increMental iMprove fact and Most obv i ous 0 f of the feedback principle Added to S!,lsteM i ) The firs1: incorporation additions are: 2) 3) 4) 5) 2nd stage in series (Koenig 2-3) 6) Multifrequency AM tranSMitter (Koenig 1-2) 7) Untuned diode radio receivers (Harsch) EM COUPling (Koenig 1-2) FM receiver (O'Neil) IR COUPling (Koenig 2-3) these MO d i f i cat ion s ( 50% ) (O"Meil. Koenig 2-3) is the Other ( ( 3) Modula~or (Hars(h - lis~ed as 36 MHz AM-fM genera~or) U I ~rasoni c 3enera~ors (Koen ig 1-2, In s~ep 2 ~hese C ou I d now be genera~ors since ~he~ now work EliMina~ed frOM s~s~eM ~) AM receiver (O;Hei1) 2) AcouS~iC coupling (Koenig ~-2) 3) Wobble genera~or (Koenig 2-3) 4) considered low frequene~ Rf in~o an EM ra~her ~han acous~iC COUPling) 5) ligh~ing effec~s (HarSCh) 6) 7) UU 8) laMp <HarSCh) TU receiver (Harsch) "." fM receiver (HarSCh - 1 used ins~ead Of 2) '",'. One o~her ~hing Migh~ be Men~ioned before we leave ~he sUbjec~. Our iMaginar~ developMen~ Moun~ain is cone shaped. This in effee~ Means ~ha~ al~hough ~he various ~rails Ma~ be ver~ far apar~ a~ ~he foo~ 0 f nee ess i ~~, o f ~he Moun"ta in, as ~he~ progress upward "the~ wi II, gradua II ~ draw closer "toge~her un"t i 1 ~he~ converge i n~o a sing 1 e ~rail near ~he peak. This of course, Means ~ha~ as various s~s~eMs progress fur~her

and fur~her along ~heir respective develOPMent ~ra i Is, "the~ wi II gradua II ~ COMe closer and closer ~o reseMb 1 i ng each o~her. If we COMpare ~he la~es~ version of ~hese ~hree s~s~eMs, we see "tha~ be~ween ~heM ~here is considerable difference. But if we cOMpare ~he ~hree lates~ verSions wi~h the ~hree earlier verSions, we see ~ha~ ~he difference be~ween ~he earlier versions is even greater. i"t is al ready bee oMing apparen~ ~hat ~here is a trend in the general direc~ion of design convergence. In O~her words I I .. THROUGH COHTIHUOUSlY REPEATED STAGES" in As has been Mentioned before, in 1975 Mar~ received the Message "feedback ~hrough con~inuousl~ repeated sec~ions <s~ages)", -frOM her The Message was Grand fa~her given As ~he Message was given ~elepa~hically in the Cherokee language. lin i c knaMe") , 1:0 her, Mar~s' Grand fa~her, Ch i e f Buc keye, rOOM ligh~ing) appeared clearl~ direc~l~ in fron~ of her. is absolu~el~ cer~ain. ~his Message was given ~o her b~ her Mary Grand-fa~her. ~he Spir i ~ wor I d. (Eng Ii sh ("orMal Where did "this MeSsage originate? ThiS we do not know, but we are cer~ain i~ did no~ origina~e frOM Marys' Grandfa~her. Bu~ there are SOMe per~inen~ fae~s ~ha~ should be Men~ioned. first, although Marys' Dad was an Electronics Engineer eMplo~ed for Many ~ears b!,l IBM, neither Mary nor her Grandfa~her know any~hing whatsoever abou~ a Man of elec~ronics. i ntegri t~, bO~h wi ~h i n

~he Tr i be and wi th in hi sown faMi Iy. In Shor~, not ~he kind of Man who would have given ~his inforMation to frOM knowl edgeab I e us un1 ess he hi Msel f was cer~ai n i t had COMe AU~hority. Second, Chief Bucke!,le was respec~ed as 18 - 18 Unlike MOS~ (bu~ no~ all) of ~he variOus inforMation received b~ differen~ researchers, vague ~o M~s~erious black boxes, high freqUencies. e~c •• ~he infOrMa~ion we have received over ~he ~ears. including ~wo visions Mar~ has had. al~hough quite And as Much of i~ as can be verified incoMple~e. is ver~ precise. Ma~heMa~icall~, is in fac~ MatheMa~icall~ verifiable. There is a very strong indica~ion here ~ha~ if ~his inforMa~ion is valid. which then ~he source Au"thorit9, we will know in ~he due course of tiMe, who ever ~he~ Ma~ be. know preciSely what ~echnology is required to clarif~ voice recep~ion. references 1 once read that Edison and his helpers, had to do nearly a thousand experiMen~s before they sucCeeded in crea~ing ~he elec~ric This was of course a ver~ tedious process tha~ involved ligh~. frOM Molten glass. attaching an eleMent to a base, blOWing a bulb attac h i ng and sea ling ~he bu I b and reMOV i ng as MUC h air as There poss i b I e Wi 1:h a were not a dozen differen~ wa~s. or even two or three different wa~s to Make a It had In like Manner

we are ~old frOM the Spiri~ world, that to be right. c an be "there clarified. There are no oP~ions. then There were no op~ ions. I ight bUlb. There was one way. and one way only. is one way and one way on I y c rude VaCUUM PUMP. that voi c e rec ept i on How Much is the enligh~enMent of HUMani~~ wor~h? Is it worth as Huch effort as learning how ~o light up Mans' living quarters? I think so, --- and Much More if necessary. Over the ~ears there have been SOMe researchers who have given up because they were not able to c 1 ar i fy rec ep"t ion. A few Ma~ even have COMe to "the c onc I us i on tha"t clarifica"tion Migh"t not be possible bY' "technical Means. even "though the field is s~ill wide open with thousands of possibilities Thank God Edison did not reach anY' such conclusion still untied. If he had. we after a would be getting our Mon~hly utility bill frOM our local Candle S~iCk Maker few dozen, or even after Many dozen failures. instead Of frOM the power COMpan~. When we firs"t received ~his initial Message to build SOMe kind of experiMental circuit and frOM "the other side. I had More ques~ions than answers. Exac"tlY what did they Mean 11: would not be very by "con"tinuously (endlessly) repeated s1:ages"? practical then duplicate ~his s~age un~il one had PC boards stre~ched across "the workbenc h.

ou"t the front door. and ac ross the s~reet. There had ~o Bu~ if ~here was a finite nUMber. be SOMe kind of fini~e nUMber. "then how could they be endleSSlY' repea"ted? The answer is ~ha~ one can crea~e a string of endlessl~ repeated s~ages in ~he saMe way they can crea"te an endless piece of s1:ring. which is SiMPly by tying the ends In elec~ronic terMS this Means applying or feeding back "the output of the last s1:age ~o ~he inpu~ of ~he first though there is SOMe fini~e nUMber stage. circuit would "see" an infinite of stages. nUMber of identical stages ahead. In this arrangeMent. even the signal within together. a The next in forMa1: i on not consis~ of. but also gave even whe~her or not there M~ster~ unt i 1 Marc h 1977. quest i on then, onlY' gave no was how clue as ThiS initial stages shou I d no clue as to how Man~ there should be. or This reMained a was an optional nUMber. Man~ s"tages? the to what At th is "t i Me wh i 1 e work i ng on a s~steM 16 - 11 ~hiCh by chance con~ained seven s~ages. it was indicated ~o Mary. by MY younger Brother who en~ered the Spirit world when he was 28. that this was the right nUMber of stages. (ThiS inforMation was published by Mr Dav i sPec k in the Surv i va I Researc h F oundat i on news

letter. March 1979) In 1988 Marys' Grand fa'ther showed her t"'':' _ £ ."st viS i on In this vision. Mary saw what she described The of a as a Transreceiver. MOSt "topless boX shaped container filled with electronics. prOMinent fea~ure was a series of upside down "U" shaped eleMents. Mary feels her Grandfa~her drew her a~tention ~o 'these eleMents. She is certain there were seven. At this point we had been told by MY Brother that seven was the right nUMber of stages. and 'thiS had been reaffirMed at a la~er date by Marys' Grandfather. Later on this inforMation was verified by an outside source when Dr Senkowski wrote ~hat a Gen~leMan in Italy, a Radio Engineer if I recall correctly, had been independently told 'that seven sections were necessary. Why Th i s st ill reMai ns a Mystery. 'the nUMber seven? Why not six or eight or three or fifteen. or any other nUMber? We ~ight however speculate that this is prObably the optiMal balance between benefit and distortion type of stages necessary, --- whatever they are. Since all electronic circuits, no Matter how well engineered. generate a certain aMount of noise and distortion. the More stages there are in series. the More the Signal wou 1 d deter i orate be fore it is returned "to "the input and probab I Y the lower would be the percentage of usable feedback. On the other be since hand, aCCUMulative large nUMber of s~ages would be advan"tageous. We

Migh"t speculate "then that the Spirits are telling us seven is the best COMprOMise. "the Modulation in a series configura~ion. a percen"tage would the special "theory for in c As Men"t i oned, through at least three differen"t people on ThrOUgh MY Brother. MY Wi fes' Grand father, of "the Transpar"tners th i s strong 1 y what is necessary reMinded of an old saYing: 'th i s in forMat i on has been given to researchers "three separate occasions. and through one or More I east to Me. Author i ty knows prec i se I y aM i nd i cates that the sourc e to clarify reception. the Gen"t I eMan In writing I ta I y • thiS in At 0 f I "After all else has failed, as a last final resor"t, --- try reading ~he instructions." As c an be seen fro", a MatheMat i c a I standpo i n~ . frOM the ac COMPanYi ng tabl e. usi ng Mul t i pi eo for s~ages Makes good sense exaMple. we aSSUMe a voice Modulation percentage of D.l/' in a single s~age non-feedback Modula~ion percentage is of course. 0.1%. As was· discussed in "the last issue. 'thiS can be considerabl~ iMProved by adding feedback in the SysteM. In this-case if we aSSUMe D.l/' voice Modulation and are able to use the resu It i 09 MOdu I at i on perc entage as seen at the 50% detee tor has dou ..

·...... I f we "then go further and add S More stages. the resulting Modulation percentage raises ~o 1.41%. or over 7 tiMes the single stage Modulation percen"tage. configuration, feedbac J-;.. 'to 8.2% final then our I f 1ft - II File- SlI 10 5toQes ulll l-leisensole L--R_F_G_e_n_S---.i : ...................... : .• :......... :-1:··.···. ................................................. 1.: ................................. ...... ~~ ... ~.~~ .............. , ... ::.~~~:?.~:::::::--4 ,+, 7 Staqe with Feedback --- Specified by Spirit l-lorld I 1 H ~ H 3 H 4 H 5 H 6 H ~ i ./l 7' r--':-'~' --, I Det t--...,.-~:o I AF Amp ~II t'lod ! 0: I AGe t I T 1 Staqe 1 Stage 2 ~_RF_G_e_n--"H 2 Staqe with Feedback --- Koeniq System J...:----- , ... ) : / . , . - - - - - - - - - - - Ii \ ' - - - - - - ' Receiver AF Amp Record '·'ike C-=--:.- ~------------I-- ----~ 13 Tone Recorder I Sinqle 5taqe with Feedback --- O"Neil S4stem Transmitter II RF Cen I' AF Gen Transmitter Nethod RFA~~ f--1. I .---~ L---r---: i Feedback t1ike I ! I Receiver r::=~1==~~~----------' II QF;Amp I I net I I ---:>1:01 AF Amp H i Record r-~ i . - - - r·like . 10 - 13 The stages feedback. is always SOMewhat over 7 As can be seen froM the chart, this relationship holdS for f ina I Modu I at i on perc entage d if ferent perc

entages 0 f using 7 the percentage resulting froM use of only a Single stage. Although not shown, this relationship also holds true for different levels of initial voice ~o d u I at ion. c au s e a n instead Of 0.1%. and we aSSUMe 50% individual stage Modulation of 1% whiCh. Modulation feedbac k. "then a sing I e stage reSU I ts in on I y 2% On the de pen din g 't h e car r i e r , wo U I d be v eo r y d iff i cui 't to hear. a 14.1. o'ther hand wi'th a seven s"t:age systeM thi s would result in should Modulation percentage which, again depending on the carrier. be quite easy to unders"t:and. the S pi r its are I f f 0 r ex a MP Ie. tiMes a b I e 0 n 1: 0 ( iMprove the S/H ratio. In ord i nary rad i os we use spec i a I ""tun i ng "teC hn i ques" suc h as 'tanks or c r!,!sta Is, bea't frequenc i es. in order It is M!,! belief that those whO are 'the the the the 'tuned to source of this feedbac k e f fee 1: ""tun i ng TranscOMMunica'tion signal 'to noise ratio. the MU I t i stage con f i gurat i on are inforMation are tha't two 0 f f i I ters, e'tc., researchers 'tee

hn i ques" nec essar!,! telling iMprove 'that are and 'to Modulation % after 100 feedback cycles Generator output 1 V Test Voice Modula'tion 0.1 % FB % 1 S'tage 10 20 30 40 50 S8 70 SO 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 99.1 99.2 99.3 99.4 99.S 99.S 99.7 99.8 99.9 1ft - 14 .111 .125 .143 .167 .200 .258 .334 .582 1.01 1.12 1.26 1.45 1.69 2.03 2.51 3.26 4.49 S.61 6.90 7.21 7.53 7.88 8.25 8.65 9.07 9.52 10.0 ' l ' l ' l 2 Stage . '- '- '" .250 .286 .334 .401 .582 .670 1.01 2.04 2.27 2.56 2.93 3.43 4.13 5.15 6.72 9.30 13.8 14.4 15.1. 15.8 16.5 17.3 18.2 19.0 20.0 21.0 4 Stage 7 Stage .781 .879 ( 1.01 1.18 1.41 1. 77 2.38 3.61 7.49 8.40 9.54 11. 1 13.1 16.0 " .... -r - ,;". 27.4 39.2 60.6 .445 .501 .573 .670 .804 1. 01 1.35 2.04 4.16 4.64 5.25 6.04 7.10 8.60 10.S 14.3 20.0 30.2 31.5 33.0 34.S 36.3 38.1 40.0 42.1 44.3 46.6 I TO :ReM ";C C-1280, S TAG E = ";S:PRIHT 1'01 P GEH TEST " or CYCLES = MOOULATOR":PRIHT:PRIHT A 1'01 A L Y S I S":PRIHT 80 COLUMH BILL WEISENSALE HUMBER Of STA6ES TEST ~EEDBACK % MULTISTAGE ~EEDBACK TO SIHGLE MODULATOR U T":PRINT OUTPUT VOLTS P-P = ";G:PRIHT VOICE MODULATIOH % :: 10 60TO 50 26 REM 30 REM 40 REM 50 SCHCLR:CLR:COLORS,4:COLORS,7 SO PRIHT:PRIHTTAB(22)"M U L

T I 70 PRINTTAB(28)"A ~ fEEDBACK 30 PRIHTTAB(31)"1) A T A 90 INPUT" 100 IHPUT" •• ; M : P R I H T : M= M/ 100 118 IHPUT" 120 INPUT" ";F:PRIHT:F=F/I00 130 INPUT" 140 PRIHT:PRIHT:PRIHTTAB(32)"AHALYZE- A":PRIHT:PRIHT 150 PRIHTTAB(20)"RESET- R"TAB(50)"STOP- SPACE" 160 6ET AS:IF AS= .... THEH160 170 If AS=CHRS(S5)THEH220 180 i f AS=CHRS(82)THEHI0 266 If AS=CHRS(32)THEH STOP 210 60T0160 220 SCHCLR 230 Il=G:I2=6+(6*fl) 240 If S=1 THEH280 250 fOR Y=l TO 3-1 260 12=12+(12*M) 218 NEXT Y 288 Oi=Il:D2=12+(12*M):D=D2-Di:fi=(D/6)*~:M~=«D2-Dl)/D1)*100:)(=)(+1 298 If X=}C 1HEN310 308 6010230 318 SCNCLR:PRIHTTAB(22)"M U L TIS T A 6 E S":PRINT:PRIHT 328 PRIHTTAB(29)"0 A T A 330 PRIHTTAB(28)"GEH OUTPUT = "6" VOLTS P-P" 340 PRIHTTAB(11)"TEST VOICE MODULATION = "M*100" %" 356 PRIHTTAB(22)"HUMBER O~ STAGES = "s 360 PRIHTTAB(2S)"TEST fEEDBACK = "f*160" %" 376 PRIHTTAB(22)"HUMBER Of CYCLES = "C:PRIHT:PRIHT 380 PRINTTAB(33)"A 1'01 A L Y S I S":PRINT 390 PRIHTTAB(25)"DETECTOR IHPUT= "D2" V" 400 PR I NT: PR I HTTAB (24)"OETECTOR ql~-:-:- ... i= "0" V" 410 PRIHT:PRIHTTAB(25)"~EEOBACK LEVEL= "f1:Mf=«02-0i)/D1)*100 429 PRIHT:PRINTTAB(23)"FIHAL MOOULATIOH= "Mf" %" 436 PRIHT:PRIHT:PRIHTTAB(20)"RESET- R"TAB(50)"STOP- SPACE" 440 GET AS: If AS=· .. ·THEN440 450 If AS=CHRS(B2)THEH10 460 If AS=CHRS(32)THEH STOP E 1'01 T ERE O":PRINT A HAL Y S I Since I aM f i rs t analyzing issue. I researc hers. 1:WO HeckMann, whO"S opinion was published in "the jus1: a "re-cycled" Air ~orce Radar Technician. af1:er las1: the froM cer1:ain o1:her these peop I e was Mr Hans The other feedback effect as was described for cri1:iciSM of 1:he analysis

0 f WhOM rep lied. in 1:he issue. las1: ask One 0 f 18 - U .... as Mr Al exander Mac Rae. Scien~is~ and Engineer who has worked for NASA at the SR I researc h researc h Sco~land 1:0 open his own Elec"tronics COMpany. fOllowing cOMMen"t 1:0 Make: As SOMe ':fOU know, Mr Mac Rae is a for SOMe years on audio c en~er, be fore return i ng "to Mr MacRae had "the 0 f "I found your le1:1:er and "teChnical analysis ver':,l in1:ereS1:ing, and I have SOMe cOMMen~s COMing "through on "tha~ - SO s"tand by! You are defini"tely on 1:he righ"t lines." Mr MacRae also enclosed a copy of a paper he had wri1:1:en which scien1:ific 1:0 1:his subjec~ and gives a More in par1: per1:ains explana~ion. To wi"t: (In par1:) LabOra1:ory Ho1:ebook Ho. 2 The UnQUeS1:iOning Beliefs of SCience. (1) It is as1:onishing how few scien1:is"ts aSk theMselves - "Wha1: ACTUALLY IS a physical law"? (2) 11: is saddening to "the POin1: of despair how few scien1:is1:s aSk ~heMselves "How do physical "laws" GET COMMUNICATED "to all "the "things 1:hey control"? ( A Physical "law", (as we call i1:), s~a1:eMen~ 0 f Max i MUM probab iii 1: i es. probabi I i ties are Certainties UP; a"t"tract nor1:h poles MaxiMa. elec~rons repel other elec"trons, etc; s1:a1:is1:iCal is a In apPles 11: is a HUMAN STATEMENT. MOS1: cases, "these Max i MUM frOM 1:rees, no1: fall down sou"th poles no1: ATTRACT; certain1:ies - probabilis1:ic

There are reasons Why suc h Max i Ma ex i s1: elsewhere - cone ep"t "tha1: de1:erMine "the charac1:eris1:ics of 1:he Physical universe. and "these are dea l"t wi 1:h bu1: for "the MOMen1: Wha1: we need 1:0 1:ake on board is 1:he is "these probab i i i st i c Max i Ma "tha"t as a group i 1: The way group - de1:erMine 1:he charac"teris1:ics of "the physical universe. i"t is norMallY pU1: is 1:ha1: i1: is "PHYSICAL LAWS" "tha1: - as a "there aren .... 1: "Physical in ~he Sky frOM Which "there isn ""t a Grea1: However inS1:ruc1:ionS are sen1: to every1:hing in LaWbook Of wha"t Ma"terial would such existence 1:0 1:ell If they ~ere ~o con1:rol Ma1:erial existence then they laws consist? would have "to consist of sOMe"thing beyond Ma"teriali"ty. Anyone Using is "tread i n9 on "t!"le ~erM "Ph!:lS i cal Laws" insubs~an"tial ground. i"t how 1:0 behave laws" as such in de fense 0 f ra1: i ana 1 i t!:l The characteris"tics of prObabilis"tic MaXiMa, in "these Cer~ain"ties. "the physical universe are reflec1:ed in 18 - 16 rtl '/ f' f~q 1001: l. 10 K 1 :r;~ .. 1:--,. l.. . [--.--.------------ .... + I .-.. --·-1 .:;; ~l'::: 1 1.11 -----_ .13_ L J __ j 7i'i54~:21 _ -to 1,1 I L_ -j ~l -j r] _ -I'i 1/ 1 u i · _ 1 ... i -:- o Tocl': U.1 1)£ 1 I) li/ ---- --I- --- -.-

.. -.--.-- I I ,,,.[ '" - ----_. --l .. ..., [J l ., lOu K > .. ::- C 2 , ~. > -"T .• , __ ._._.," L 1 . C 1 ::h C , uJ .- /'. ~L:' 11) K ;:..;----- +-:-------------i ~-1-·-~ -lk !' \ MF'S i 2907 + ; : " -.-~:," :: 1 LLU pt -.- )' .:- 8':': K 1 % "> J \~l N Gm '>·---l, WN .. 470 £: L ____ _ ------t~H Ml'S " n~r "'''A 1 1(:; f: 1 -6 l,r .... " 1n l:~' ..... ~. - - - - - - . - ~~ 1 2907 2907 1211A T.:.p Vie',', lnlA + 1907 {'_. ~.\ L~_~_~J E E: C .,/ ~J (' ~.L/ ....• _----+-. . .. I '. , .. ,~ ~: 2.2 K - - - - .. {' ,Mi-'S " ..•.. - • ..:.Yllo' _._-----------------------+._--- . I .. I' . [): . : I . -- . : I . -i - . ... .C=!] +6 V .( L_-_ : ~ . c:::!] 'C-3' 111[:;::1 W~ ~1r If == =r I~I ---~w-~H-1~-t~~-=~:v :--r-1 . ' ..• 4;'OOhrcl ............ +t; V' -6 V ~1;' f ·6 V ..... c:;:) ... "" :z CI:I ." 0 _·-' =~ C,:", I a- i" I,/) ~iii'C ... /'tl ..- ",,~Q ""VI c:;:) 2.:.' ftI ::l :;, 1/1 ~ o :;, I'll ,;-) ::::. " I'll""' :::J ::!, • 1'0 " ... J:-j 0 .... 0.:::1 ~, ~ o.ooj~

.....J ::J _. :;,:::; VlIb :::J ... oJ i:, ,.,. I'll -. ( { siMUl~aneously ~hrough ~wo Sigh~ly differen~ 1 ater c o~pare and stUdy it eas i er "to de~~c"t subt I e qua I i ~y d if ferenc es designs. the d if ferenc e, se"ts, Crystal would between have "t .... o and "then been Much different As was Mentioned previoUSlY, where one 5tarts in Te electronics Any pi ac e around "the FrOM the 0 f expel'" i Men"tat i on the Mounta i n wi 11 do. base disc uss i on 0 f ~e1:hodS in SV-g blind cOMparisons could be used as a starting point. is qu i"te apparen"t any nUMber i MMa'te!"' i a I . tra i 1 s t't 11 is: pre1:t!,l MUC h 1 ead upward. i 1: 0 f One is obViOUSly neCessary, and 1:hen add PoSSibility which appears, at least to Me, to be the MOSt logical, is 1:0 star"t ..... i'th no1:h i ng and add on I y Wha"t is nec essary . to beg i n wi th the abso 1 ute Mi n i MUM C i rc u it, add first 0 f That is, all wha1: ..... ha1:ever else is approved by the other side through blind COMparison experiMentation. is 1:he only ObviOUSly 1:his is no1: 1:he Only way 1:0 s'tar1:, bu1: Method that has the advantage 0 f not dragg i ng along exc ess baggage in 1:he way 0

f unnec essary c i rc U i 1:S . for exaMp Ie, we know rad i 0 receivers are capable of voice reception. But we also know that the Te the a rec eption of c ircui ts in a radio are nec essary 1:0 the Te rec ep1: i on proc ess, and wh i c hare irreverent? The only way we can find out is through experiMen1:ation. sOMe1:hing entirely different reception process rad io signal. So whi c h frOM is i1: There is also another reason the SiMPlest possible and work upward, and 1:his is because of eqUipMent ~ize and for exaMp Ie, one wi shed to c OMP 1 ex i ty, not to Ment i on expense. experiMen1: wi1:h 7 receiver stages and each stage cons i sted 0 f transMi tter rad i 0, and SMa 11 abOU1: 1:he Size Of i1: would literally require a whole rOOM full Of eqUipMent. Mot only would this be CUMberSOMe and iMpraC1:ical, but it would be undUly expensive as well. tranSMitter standard portab 1 e a por1:able radio, to begin with I f a a / into is to Our UI1:iMate goal Of course, a Single cabinet Of practical size. learn how "to design a is not only efficient but which can also be Transreceiver which built the best approach to this probleM would be to begin with the absolute MiniMUM and add only What in reception qUality is reached. The final result of such develOPMent

could turn out to be a relatively SiMple circuit configuration, or than anyth i ng thus far i t c ou 1 d c OMP 1 ex buil1: by anyone, or even iMagined. BU1: in ei1:her case 'the reSUlting the road) provide the highest quality ultiMate deSign will reception POSSible, and at "the saMe 1:iMe will include no circui1:s which are not necessary for it~s efficient operation. turn out to be far More the MaxiMUM possible is necessary un1:il (down And We Might begin then by asking just what is the SiMplest circuit capable of voice reception? We already know fro~ the discussion in SU-~ ~hat a radio receiver alone is capable of receiving voices, so in "theory "then, 1:he siMples1: possible radio receiver- would, at the a 1 so be the SiMP I est poss i b I e Transrec e i vel"'. Or 1:0 put saMe ~ i Me, As i 1: another way, "there is no reason known why !,I 0 u 0 n I y length of wire, a diode, and a se1: of earphones. "three COMponents, a (Fig 1) Unless one lives on "the Moon, "this arrangeMent will SiMply i: h e SiMP 1 est po s sib I e r e c e i vel" con sis ~ S i 1: wou 1 d ;)01: be. I" a d i 0 k now, 0 f SU 10 j'louser file- Bill t·leisensnle AUQ 17, 1991 (" t·Jntt Hi-Fi pOUJer Amplifier Smnn Kit No. 1025 {'louser

Elect(onics Nntionnl Circulntion Center P.O. Box 699, r'lnnsfield, TX 76063-0699 (800) 346-6873 -\. / '0' ,1, ........ , ...................................................... , ......................... , ........... , ..... , ......... ( ..... , ................ " ........................................................................ , ................................... , ............... : , , i ! I I i ! - r - ! I ... , ---"11"'"' - - - - , '.' '.,' ./ .. " . - - - - -<0 , I I i I I ...L''-_ _ _ -+-J\ 1-1 ...-----------1\ i - I - -4 T rNVI~ ~ ~~:I 1 \ I M~t--~-t-r--ill. t I I ~ ~! I ~ : j ~ ~I II i .. ~ ... , ... / ..... . ...................................................................................................................... \ ................................................................................................................................................... .. I I I I 10 - 21 Fig i Antenno l·Jire t------.,.~-. -'" Configuration 1 GeL .......... -+ ..l.. ;..i - - - - - - - . : . . . - ._ - . -.. ' - - -..• pick up "the happens to neal'" b~, i 1: Picked up, capable of live. strongest AM signal in whate··}er 3rea "the ~xperiMenter Or if there is no rela"tivel!,l strong transMitter If a trans"'itter can be then this circuit should be "the standard radio station will pick. up nothing at all. broadcast, POlice, etc .• voice reception b~ using Fig 2 Gee Recorder Method. As frOM is apparent the earphone coils. the sc heMat ie, ret if i ed RF energ!,l is applied directl~ to the earphones were capable of

responding at RF frequenc~ nothing COUld be heard because the the output wou I d be RF rather than aud i 0 • the weight diaphragMs fo I I ow on I ~ the AF frequenc ~ val'" i at ions in the RF pu I se peaks. reproducing onl~ whatever audio Modulation is carried b~ the Signal. However bee ause 0 f the coil/diaphragM COMbination, effectivel~ filtering out inertia of the Rf and and If ( ( , . I kOA81 t ~:~I . J " ) I, .. > 100 K , ", ~, .:- t, 1 1 9.5 mh IN914 • f;:t-r I J ': 100 K Fig " ... ~ pf 'I ( :- - 3 2 turns : - " - nl .. , I 22 pf I" I I " 1 \ I ...... -T- IN23F 1 r :. t , 1 .:. : 10 K ': \. 2000 pf Another wa~ ~o use this circuit i~ TC experiMentation would be Howe v e r L 0 con nee t i t d ire c t I ~ t o t h e • .... ould be applying an RF signal directl~ to an AF in this case we The solution to 1:his is to aMPlifier which does not work well. filter out the RF', i. e ., deModu I ate the signa I be fore it reac hes the recorder. This can be done b~ using either a resistor;' capacitor i n put

0 f a I'" e cor d e r . ( fig - 2 ) . .., ' - j 1 IIi --- -------1 1-- (147'-,1 ,jl-~ 1 Ul ,0033 u.f :z CO :!! o =ji;' C ... I CO is- ~'1 , Vi' C 'Dro ~, .... ::lc;:) I.Il :::10 -Z 1'0:0 . - .015 ul ... ;:( ( ( ' . , . 4., [[,h ,.. __ " . l"j l .. --._-- I l t"", ,,01 "" _1 I 10 9 :3 -;- 56? 0.1 I).i L~it (I'-'t. 1'0 vollJ!(l": (ljCl tTl)l ;:,nd ~u)Vl~::.f ~r()r';: ---:.- Ri:r.t.t. (,,-,t o ..c. ;:I :z3 :::I..jr ,., -'"7 _.n - g:zeo QO~ __ .A '1'\ - li)'1D..l.O ;:,:C'Z :!.I'O .... (')0.-:1:1 Oc:":" ;:,n .... o.!!. ~ c: 0 rJ;:' A ,., Z 0...." ... ..c. I.Il ,., I'D 3 Left 1n 100 '.of I F:cort·, t..p~ p .... : ~mp Col FI ... I -;- ") ".- F:i;;ht 1n v + , ~L--L- 1_ _ 14 13 11 11 LH .1.894 11~I -;- =~ ,0033 '.Ii F' ,-d ~~ ., .... '4-.1 J '''..L 1- _ .0(11 '.Ii R1 "J ,. -- t~ , . lh ~ I .., /....:- .. / 1 u.i -il--- .... Q N W --- -- -------- --1 ~-- 1 ui ( ( to set up an Rl cOMbination to set up an RC ~iMe constant, or a resistor / cOMbina1:ion fil"ter out "the Rf bl} responding onll} "to the audio. were known as "the

diode Method. "three variations of this circuit. (Fig 3) inductor tiMe constan1:. Either of which would Such circui"ts in fact exper i Mented wi"th bl) Konstant i n Raud i ve, and bec aMe there were frOM "the book Breakthrough I i 0 f V P-P incoto'ling is requ i red approx i Mate 11} Th i scan be SOMewhat lower threshold 0 f a signal carries SUCh circuits are quite insensi"tive and require a verI} strong Signal for anl}thing to happen. If silicon diodes are used a MiniMUM signa 1 the diode iMproved by us i ng a Gerto'lan i UM 1:hresho 1 d . ( . 5 ) diode wh i ch has a Th i s Means in effect that a if an GerManiuM diOde, 1:he Signal would have "to develop a P-P voltage in exc ess 0 f in order for deModu I a1: i on to DC e ur . requ i red here wou I d be app .... ox. 100 I 000 1: i Mes stronger (The signa 1 .000,006 IJ signa 1 we are 1:01 d i s requ i red for deModu 1 at i on 1:han 1:he in our radio telephone) This of course, would require either a verI} S1:rong or a very close tranSMitter, especially if an eX1:reMely shor1: antenna of onll} 6-10 eM (approx 2.5-4 inches) is used, as was used by Raudive. ...... 33% Modulation, IJ on "the an"tenna, even With reae h "to ,S to us

(There the eqUiPMent to send us such in their non-Ma1:erial to go about building just how the Spirits, Howhere in anI} TC li1:erature I have ever read, has i t ever been realM, are eXPlained supposed a "sledgehaMMer" electroMagnetic signal, or for that Matter, any kind of electroMagne1:ic signal at all. is of course cer1:ain evidence they can MOdulate such signals which we supply frOM here on If the SPiri1:s were capable Of sending electroMagnetic this side,) c OMMun i c at i on signa 1 s would be for theM to SiMply build SiMPle wireless to'Iicrophone tl}pe circuits (there are tens of thousands in the Spiri1: World who know to'Iost any how to dO this), and talk to us. .... ad io .... ec ei ver. the 1: h a 1: S p i r its don 0 t do "t hiS, i 1: 0 f an y kind, I hear of the Spirits using Mys'terious "transMitters" and "electroniC black bOxs", etc., c OMMun i C ate wi 1:h us, espec i a Ill} if 1:h i s in forMat i on has COMe through a Channeler, I reach for 'the salt Shaker.) 1: his t 0 b eve r y for the M to con s t r u c t e l e c t ron i c c i r cui t s S inc e such c i rcu i 'ts are very s iMpl e and sine e the first and Most obv i

ous Means in "their non-Material realM, (Personalll), when lOUd and Clear, s tr 0 n g e v ide n c e i SiMP 0 s sib 1 e thrOUgh 1: a k e to 0 l' I the radio static Method, few cases a radio Signal Mal) be present. It shou 1 d be Ment i oned at th i s po i nt there is SOMe ev i denc e In these cases, that in a in a decrease when using b a C kg r 0 U n d no i s e Wh i ch I 0 n c e bel i eve d i n die at ion the past few of AGC activation bl} an 1:0 be I i eve there May be other exp 1 anat ions for I have COMe I}ears l' e w 1: his e f l' e e t , wh i ch I wo n .r t i n t 0 her e . cases there actually is an EM signal presen1:. we May be dealing wi1:h a a if such there is. where 1:he phYSical parallel Ma1:erial dit"lension. Means would be ava~l-~le to tranSMit such Signals. inCOMing radio signal. d if ferent phenoMenon, to be a po sit i OJ e I f i n the s e a UFO or try tog 0 rec e'Pt i on suc h as the .... e frOM frOM is In did get 1 don '1: In any case Raudive

and a1: least one or two others evidently decent reception using 1:hese crude diode circui1:s. However 0 f anl}one sine e who has reported an~th i ng persona Ill} know 16 - l4 resUl"ts a~ all, even bU~ ~he MOS~ Mediocre resul~s, or ~ore of~en no have probabl~ tried 0 f researc hers, (M~se 1 f inc I Uded) ~hough dozens RaUdive was a s~rong I~ should be reMeMbered here ~hat ~his Me~hod. TransMediuM and for strong TransMediUMs MOS~ an~thing works, More or t"I~ knowledge, no atteMP~ was Made ~o deterMine whether ~he less. voices actuall~ arrived in ~he diode circui~s or whe~her ~he~ arrived in the recorder i~self. Since i~ was probabl~ not known a~ is 1:ha"t capable of voice reception, i~ was More likel~ just assuMed "the voices arrived in "the diode circui"t in "the forM of a radio signal. rec order wi 1:h no "'i c rophone or o"ther 1: i Me ~hat a i npu1:, To inpu~ As of Ment i oned, "the recorder. these I -:.t- I GeL circui1:s seeM As were frOM connected direc1:l~ in "the discussion 1:0 1:he SU-9, Fi9 4 19 K ;. :> " , I I :'1 AF Amp t'"1ouser .~ ConfiQurotion 2 (F i g-4) "the best Me~hod. conneC1:ing the carrier source 1:0 the voice recorder via pa"tch cord, is no1: I f one is ~o experiMent wi"th de"tec~or then ~he nex~ reqUireMen~ is an audio aMplifier and Circui1:s, speaker. / Mi c rophone coup ling Sligh"tl~ More efficien"t

in the recep1:ion process, bu~ i"t also allows 1:he opera~or's cOMMen1:S to be recorded. And allows ~he opera1:or 1:0 hear exac ~l ~ wha"t is be i ng rec orded inc I udi ng an~ vo ices whi ch Ma!,l be of the receiver. enough quali1:y ~o be unders~ood direc"tly "01: on I ~ i s ~he speaker gOOd frOM For this purpose vir~uall!,l an!,l SMall audio power aMpl i fier, suc h as 1:he 7 wa1:1: Hi -F i Mouser un i ~ shown (SU- 10/1f), is su i 1:ab Ie. About "the onl!,l requireMen1: being ~ha~ i~ be cOMPac~ enough so as not ~o ~ake up Much space in wha1:ever cabine~ !,Iou Plan ~o use for your experiMen~al TRs. a for rec e i ver. jus"t 11: Mi ght be aSk, few dollars one A1: this s1:age What we have, in essence, is siMPly a very crude, Why bother to do all un1:uned rad i 0 "this when far More soph i st i c ated rec e i ver at Rad i 0 Shac k? There are severa I reasons: Fir s"t , wh a"t we are wo I' kin 9 "T ran 5 r e c e i v e r I I , no~ a radiO, even ~hough a~ this stage ~he circui~ would be capable Second, "the detec"tor circuit, which .... e Of receiving radio SignalS. a a will need "to Modify. breadboard, where "the And i~ is very easy the ones 1:ha~ are

ac~ually circui~s that are presen~ are only in ~he forM of unneeded necessary, we have no excess baggage to experiMent wi~h, consis~s of i s an ex per i Me n ~ a 1 few par~s on "third, buy can 0 n a circui~s. (To be con"tinued. .) 1ft - 25 LETTERS The E lee "t ron i c s field. his deserves 1:0 be included in "this issue. 1 e"t"ter was rec e i ved A 1 1: h 0 Ugh Mr S M i "t h in"teres"ting and fo II owi ng [n gin e e r . le"t"ter is so frOM Mr G SMi "th , re"t ired is qu i"te new "to "the TC i"t cer"tainlY inforMa"tive ( "the MOS"t surprising 1:hingS (! n part) I had qui1:e "One of inadver"tentl~ discovered [UP back in "the 1930~s and dirln~1: have the wi"t to realize wha"t was going on. Also. of course, the "technology was not available in the 30~s to record and review wha"t I had heard. and could only ask a"t I plain"tively. "What was 1:ha1:? What was he saying?" "to Me was 1:ha"t had only one in real "tiMe. sho"t i"t, I had "these experiences while playing around wi"th superregenera"tive receivers in an era when "there were s"till very few s1:a1:ions on "the air and 101:s Of wide open spaces in 1:he e1:her. Of course. in 1:hose I used vac UUM "tubes, bu"t who knows whe1:her c oMParab 1 e e f fec 1:s

days c ou 1 d be ob"ta i ned Wi"th so 1 i d You Mi gh"t wan"t 1:0 give i1: a whirl. tec hno lOgy? s"ta"te have observed in 1:rouble and expose "tha1: where people i theMselves to publiC ridicule is no1: in reporting SOMe phenOMenon, but in trying 1:0 sell the public on SOMe par1:icular reason WhY 1:he phenOMenon is occurring. When you say TC are froM the deceased. 99% If you said they were frOM Mars, Maybe only 89% will pooh-pooh it. would ridicule it. frOM SOMe If you said the transMissions were ulnkno:hn pi r%a1:e radio sta1:ion you were 1:rying to 10ca1:e and iden1:ify. ess .. an 1 • would doubt you. ge1: (, There"'s a case in pOin"t right here in Prince"ton. There~s a fine laboratory where scientific s1:udies are being Made of the effec1: of If Mind on such "thingS as "the oU"tpu"t of a "they had S1:a"ted PUbliclY "tha1: "they were s1:udying psychokinesis. 1:he experiMen"ters would have been Bu"t "they were SMar"t. They c a II ed "the i r work "the s"tUdy 0 f eng i neer i n9 anOMa 1 i es. and "they are highly respeC1:ed. randOM nUMber genera"tor. laughed ou"t of "town. (Love "Engineering civiliza"tion paragraPh! AnoMa 1 i es" are go i ng on around is no"t ye"t ready for such s"tudies! I wonder hoW -Ed) o"ther "the world s"tudies because of our rest'""c.:1:abili1:y. I can think of a couple of ways "tha"t EUP could be cloaked in

grea"ter NearlY scien1:ific 0 f everyone agrees. SOMe re I uc "tanc e. "that we 0 l' inforMation via the unconscious. And those of a Jungian persuaSion (inClUding Me) view "the collective unconscious as 1:he reposi"tory of virtuall~ an infinite aMount of additional inforMation. read i 1 y. so .... e wi th a cons i derab 1 e degree have leas"t 1:0 social scien1:is"ts. 1:re .... endous ac cess aMoun1: a1: "to a One of "the MOS1: reliable ways of accessing the personal unconscious is by Means of can~1: help wondering whether whi1:e noise (or the randOM noises of rain. wind or isn"1: 1:he aUdi1:ory equivalen1: of the visual S1:iMUlus of wa1:erfalls) inkblo"ts trigger the unconscious "to produce for us The inkblo1:s. Perhaps whi1:e noise visual iMages of personal the Rorschach significance. inkblo"t tes1:. And I HI - Z6 'triggers significance. unconscious to produce word sounds of personal A good way to test this proposition would be to give half a dozen people copies of the saMe tape and have each one decOde it without If they all caMe up with precisely the saMe consulting "the others. ,",essage, If there i1: would blow the above theory out of the water. was not COMplete agreeMent, then it would be appropriate "to call in a crew of clinical PSYCholOgists to ferret out the eXPlanations. engineering The other possibility I had in Mind is More or less inspired bY "the now Princeton the inc ontrovert i b 1 e evi dence tha~

SOMe peopl e are abl e ~o e ffec t to a sta~itically significant output of the RHG by degree. is a And nOise diOde. it"'s MY understanding that the heart Of the RHG thought alone, anOMalies s~udies. There is c an a f fee t thought ' .... oluMinous technical studies and Your aMPI i f i er wi th no Mi c rophone c onnec ted and the ga i n wide open is dOing the saMe thing as the noise diode in the RHG. And we know the no i se diode. that thousands of pages of There are the 0 per a tor"' s s tat i s tic a I unconscious a statistically significant degree? But here we have a double whaMMY; the the interpretation of the signal. This Might even explain why psyChics get clearer reception." So wh yeo u I d n "' t the output Of his aMplifier tab I e s t 0 b a c k affecting the no i se generated by unconscious influencing t hat up. signal BOTH the and to be is Reply The experience you had in the 30"'s, I think, was extreMely rare but not unique. Others have reported SiMilar inCidents, even the rec ept i on You c erta i n I y did have the wit to realize and reMeMber this as ineXPlicable incidents. inc i den~s were rat i ona I i zed away and I forgotten. 0 f unexp 1 a

i ned Messages on te 1 etype. th ink it probab 1 e MOSt suc h I personally. I would agree with Jung that there is a collective unconscious. I know for a fact telepathy is real because it has happened to Mary It is not too difficult then to hypothesize that and hUMans are connected by a kind of unconscious telepathic SOMe or all do not however believe this can eXPlain Te voices which network. I are clearly frOM very individual, conscious, intelligent entities. investigated SpiritualiSM If I recall correctly, Jung was a student of FreUd. Freud, in later life, becaMe very interested in SpiritualiSM and is said to have Made the stateMent that had he his life to live over, he would have the Mind. A 1 though Jung and FreUd went the i r separate ways, it oc curs to Me that about reached SpiritualiSM without Making his beliefs public. Perhaps in using the t e r M .. col lee t i ve un con sci 0 u s I I J u n g was call in 9 S pi r i t u a lis M an "Engineering abnorMality" in order 1:0 Make it More accep1:able 1:0 hiS Peers. a SiMilar conclusion Just a 1:hough1:. Jung May studying rather also than have 1 istening to equivalent of the RorSChach Indeed various AF carriers I have i nkb 1 ot test. is no the aud i tory doubt what so 1ft - U evep that

on occasion the Mind does forM a voice out of noise where in fact no such voice eXists. This argUMent applies however, only As to "the very weakest vo ices. "th i s researchers have and VOid. argUMent rec orded voic es that c an be exaMi ned on an osc i 11 oscope. And an oscilloscope doesn~t have Much iMagination. • ... 0 ices bee OMe beCOMes null Many, Many lOUder, the I n f 0 u n d 1 abo rat 0 r y stu die s i t has bee n i: hat 0 r din a r y h u Ma n voices can be understood even at several DB BELOW the noise level. Understandability however, drops off rapidly until a1: about -6 DB only about 18% of what is said can be understood. This Minus DB area is the level whiCh I have been calling non-MediUMistiC, and is I have reason to believe the Spirits can effect the level at which the equipMent directlY without the help or even the presence of an I was Operator. Coincidentally, when told Ion 1 y un d e r s tan dab 0 u t I 8 % 0 f wh a t The eqUiPMent real senSitiVity 1:0 the point that negative DB reception is brought up to a po 5 i t i ve DB to everyone. the y act u all y say. iMprove t hat T C co MMU n i cat ion is MO

r e a v ail a b 1 e TC COMMunication, I ask how Much I understand. challenge 1 eve I is in "to s: {) I heard. iMagination. In MY early work, because the voices were so weak, I was quite for this reason I concerned that they May SiMply be MY I would tell her only freqUently ask Mary "to listen to recordings. thought there Might be a voice at a certain count, but not that I a I MOSt a I ways agreed on gender and had a high, what Even where we did not over 58%, agreeMent about what was said. agree, about ha 1 f the tiMe there was close SiMi I ar i ty, sue h as one of us hearing "We are here" and the other hearing "Three are here". the saMe further refined this teChnique, and sti 11 had Later we I wou 1 d 1 i sten to the rec ord i ng, wr i te down what I heard resu Its. and tell Many nothing. Mary would then do the saMe. Only after we were both finiShed woUld we COMpare what we had written down. We Even on high quality voices there is not always 188% agreeMent For exaMple, because of differences in individual a weak but different two think, is no"t tha"t "there be that hUMan vo ices wh i c h receiVing on what is said. hearing radio ordinary interpre"ta"tions. 188% agreeMent. but rather the bas i c

cannot be explained by SCience, are appearing systeMS. ::;ensi"tivi"ty, etc., broadcast The COMe I fac t iMPortan"t pOin"t, "two people can listen "to up with in our and ( ( i"t is indeed "the Operator's unconsciOUS Mind whiCh I do believe, as you say. that in the case of TransMediuMistic is And there SOMe years ago in a Mr 1ngo i ntens i ty 0 f an Underground Magnet i c On another the Hew York City therMoe oup 1 e the likelY. But recep"tion, effecting the receiving systeM to a significant degree. is a certain aMount of evidence to back this up. a Laboratory here Swann was ab 1 e field aSSOCiated with SOMe kind of particle detee-tor. occasion. Co 11 ege. Sealed MagnetiC effected SOMething was effec"ted. field and the electroniCs or gauges. "therMOS bottle. Whether he actually effected e f fee ted the teMperature as reg i stered by a in California. LiverMore is an open question. this SaME' GentleMan, teMPera"ture or. as "to effect the I believe, tests at far More think in in a I 16 - iii Mr Ura Geller I Gent I eMan who c an bend Meta 1 th i nk has to do the saMe, i n dee d I f we e f f e c t Ma t t e r . 1:wO pieces of Metal toge1:her, a C onversat i on through phone true 0 f PSychokinetic Metal. If a lit1:le bit energy. is naMe correc1:l!,l) spelling his

b!,l concentration aMp 1 Y deMonstra1:ed the and has taught others that "the Mi nd can use a 101: of elec1:ricit!,l we can weld if we use a little bit we can carryon Ny guess is 1:hat the saMe is lines. can ben d SOl i d I f we use a lot i t used i~ can facilita1:e Te COMMunication. When forMal SCience finally PUlls it"s head out of the sand, and recognizes the exiS1:ence of Te, 1:he arguMen1: will n01: be abou1: 1:he exis"tence of Te VOices, because "their existence is an undeniable fact. Wha1: "'they will argue abou1: is "'their origin. by 0 f a Mi nd (presenc e the TranSMed i UM) . In TransMediuMistic reception we have an effect on I"Iatter By (e I ec "tron i c s) definition "then, Te COMl"lunication is a PSYChokinetic effect. The real argUMen"t "then is whe"ther the vOices origina1:e in the Operator"s sube onse i OUS, or whe1:her 1:he Opera1:or" S subC onsc i ous is used as a SUCh tranSMitters are used "re 1 a~ 1:ransl"li tter" in "the sal"le sense as in AMateur radio cOI"IMunication 1:0 receive, aMplif!,l, and retransMi1: a telepathic signal received frOM a Spirit, signal. which pS!.lchOkinetic a r 0 r wh a t i t : i s wo r t: h , it i s s i 9 n a 1 wh i c h e f fee t: s know of who has had I MY opinion, these t:hat personal

experience wi"th Te COMl"lunication, al"thoUgh vo ices, 1:he!,l a TransMed i UM, t:hrough origina"te frOM external, conSCious, in"telligen"t en"ti"ties. then "al"lplified" and "rebroadcast" as "the OPinion of ever!.lone inMost cases, May t: h e e l e c t ron i c s . In 1:his case a COMe and is COMMentS Abou"t The SV Series The following cOMMen1:s have been received frOM our they did not know "these COI"IMents would be printed, the COMMen1:S, no1: the naMes. readers. Since I will print only i ) recently. of the ar1: i C 1 e generation. stiMUlates MY "Was de 1 i ghted to rec e i ve Sp i r i t Uo ices /'to 9 that: !,IOU sent Me lot: out frOM UTF Pos1: regard i ng 1:he wobb 1 e MethOd 0 f vo ice i1: A 101: of good Material in it. to see novel circuitS EspeciallY got a regard as t:his in Love iMagination along SiMilar lines. It's great to know you are able to produce "Voices" reasonably for iMPortant and needed fee l i t is a very foe us I regu 1 ar 1 y technical research into EUP." "In clOSing, let Me say "that I adMire your writ:ing talents ver!.l 2) I could write as well as you dO. Everything is ver!.l Much. clear and unaMbiguous and a pleasure "'to read (the onlY "thing "that bugs Me is your insistence on I"Iisuse of the apostrOPhe). " I wish "to "I was very Pleased

two recent copies of 3) liSp i r i t 00 ices" and have you bee OMe ae t i ve aga i n as you have a 101: to offer. job and know you MUSt: We need 1:ee hn i cal 1 eadersh i p in 1 ead a very busy 1 i fe. th i S country and you seeM 1:0 be "the one apprec i a1:e your "as issues COMe I underStand the constraints of faMily and "t i Me perMi 1:s" and was surpr i sed tha"'t seeMed close toge1:her." job on. "to have to 1:ake the re't:eive I two !,lour 18 - l'J ( ( ree e i ved. in what is a very ted i ous and I would like to thank our reau~rs for these COMMents and others 1:ha1: have been 'Jery enc ourag i n9 I illusions about either MY writing abili1:Y or have however, There are others More qualified in both areas technical knowledge. aM doing "this is because it "than needs to be done, and thus far no one else here in the US has steped forward to volunteer. eon f i denc e tiMe c onsuMi ng ail'l to do "thiS. The reason 'T'otes Your jOb. are no 0 f I I I n a sen s e is an eMbryo "technology. However, TranscoMMunica"tion in "th i s fie I d ga i ns MOMen"tuM, As in "the due course "tec hn i c al researc h o f

t i Me "there wi 11 be o"thers More 9 i f"ted than I, WhO wi 11 beg i n wri"ting "technical papers and newsle"t"ters far More sOPhistica"ted than 1: his. F" art "t hen, wh a t I hope "these papers un"t i 1 "the Cava I ry ge"t here. will be of helP "to you in your own work. I have personallY found Te fascina"ting and aweSOMe, and it is bound to beCOMe even More so as tiMe goes on and reception begin "to iMProve. All of you working in this field are pioneers in one of the greatest adventures that has ever been under"taken by Mankind. I and 0 i n g I n "the Mean "t i Me i s try i n g to hoi d "t h e HOTES C 1 ar if i c a"t i on--- "the wobble effec"t, I n "the last issue there were two art i c I es i.) reprin"ted frOM one Of 1:he GerMan newsle"tters. One of "these articles was about "the o"ther ar"ticle Mentioned "this Since i"t was nO"t s"ta"ted o"therwise, "the iMpression was left effec"t. "these "two peop I e who disc overed "th i s tha"t 0 f e f feet. in 1)0 ices 0 f E"tern i"ty by Sarah Estep, whiCh probablY MOS"t bu"t perhaps no"t all of you have read, it was Sarah who discovered the wobble effec"t, and should be so credi"ted. i"t May have been one As was Men"t i

oned frOM California, 16 year Old Taralyn Ken"t, daughter of Nr Ray Ken"t, 2) an Elec"troniCS Engineer "the younges"t gif"ted TransMediUM in "the USA, and perhaps in "the World. AMong o"ther "things she is "the only one I know of whO has received a gOOd qua Ii ty, qu i te understandab I e vo ice, on her first at"teMpt a"t Tara I yn has had good resu l"ts by us i ng a very so ft AF" rec ord i ng. carrier, USUallY radio s"tatic. is placed several feet away, or across the rOOM frOM "the recorder, and the level is set low the enough record level Meter. to be barely de"tec"tible or not de"tectible a"t all on is wi"thout The radio doub"t a . ..., ·-1 who c oMpu"ter ed i t i n9- COMPu"ter Ed;+~~g--- 3) a deMonstrat i on "tape 0 f frOM Mr A I ex Mac Rae 0 f Sco"tland, to 3 COMputer Transco~Munication. add-on board containing an A/O and O/A converter. A SegMent of tape is directed to the A/D converter where it is conver"ted to a binary At this point i t can be saved to data string and stored in RAM. disk as a data file, and also Manipulated in variOUS ways. Under A short while back frOM as involves origina"ted "this the teChnique technique received Briefly applied I 18 - 38 sof"tware con"trol, any par"t of "this s"tring can be replayed "through the D/A converter and then d i rec

ted to an AF a .... p and/or rec order. This allows "the noise in"to "the voice, and also "the noise leading leaving only trai I ing the voice to be very accurately tri .... ed away "the voice i"tself. This in fac"t can be done so accura"tely "tha"t even at the highest voice frequencies, a single cycle of the voice can be added or sub"trac"ted. On co .... e I "think in very worthwhile "the deMons"tra"t i on "tape, "there are severa I weaker vo ices which have been edi"ted in this faShion, and i t defini"tely Makes the .... 1"t does no"t of course clarify recep"tion easier "to unders"tand. i"t can do no"thing abou"t "the noise which is because a"t "this poin"t included be"tween "the beginning and end of "the voice, bU"t i"t does i .... prove .... en"t, especially where weaker resul"t I can say "thiS is "the firs"t "teChnique voices are concerned. everyone. down "to c 0 MP u"t e r a s we 1 I a s s p e cia 1 so f"t wa r e Un for "t una"t ely, and Modera"te 1 y expens i ve spec i a I equi pMen"t. i"t is no"t beyond "the range 0 f poss i b ili"ty "tha"t sOMewhere down "the 1 i ne SOMeone May set up a cOMputer ed i"t i ng serv ice where one c ou 1 d send "tapes for e d i 1: i n 9 , MU C

h a s we sen d in ph 0 "t 0 9 rap hie f i 1 M 1: 0 bed eve lOp e d. Mr MacRae has "this to say abou"t "the "technique: (The following is a brief quo"ta"tion LABORATORY HOTEBOOK Ho. 3, which is unfortuna"tely .... uch "too en"tirely reprin"t in "thiS issue. co .... ple"te copy, frOM "the original Material of long "to If any of you would like "to have a I will be happy "to send i"t "to you upon reques"t. -Ed) line r e qui res a be of helP "tha"t would "the Bu"t "to i t 1I1"t is nO"t .... y purpose here "to go into full design de"tai Is, even if space allowed, bU"t ra"ther "to give enough basiC inforMa"tion "to enable "the "the 0 f and indeed "to COMputerized design "to be described in "this ar"ticle - be ab I e c o .... e across. c oMpu"ter i zed sys"teMs "the reader May judge o"ther o"therwi se. goodness. eva 1 ua"te reader "the or "to "to ("Playback l l Then on read, In "this new design "the Moving par"ts of a recorder .... ould be replaced by RAM - the audio analog inforMa"tion would be digi"tised and wri"t"ten incre .... en"ting "the address by one each "tiMe a sa .... ple .... as in"to RAM, ) all you would have "to do was taken. specify .... hich address "to s"tar"t reading and which "to s"top reading to To sa ....

ple a waveforM "then you .... us"t take give very precise edi"ting. saMp 1 es fast enough a"t .... ave for.... The slowes"t sa .... pling leas"t in rUdiMen"tary for .... frequency "tha"t you can have is called the Hyquist frequency. and it is twi c e "the highest frequenc y that you wi sh to sa .... p 1 e . So, if you wish "to saMple UP to 3.2 KHz. (whiCh is "the upper -3db frequency in telephone quali"tY frequency band), then the Hyquist frequency will a be 6.4 KHz, 6466 saMples per second. frOM "those saMPles. to rec ons"truc t "to be ab I e "the Tha"t c overs "the frequenc y, bu"t wha"t signal. range. word. For speech Suppose "tha"t that varies - widely. we conver"t each saMple 0 f the aMp I i "tude 0 f "the ana I og large dynaMi c 8 digi"t binary it has in"to a an (chart) The range of POSitive values goes therefore fro.... a MiniMu.... of 111 - 31 deciMal to 128, that is 255. i ~o a MaxiMuM of ~he SUM of all ~he deciMal values frOM 1 So. if .... e say that 255, or all of the 8 bits equal to binary i, is 1 volt, for exaMple, ~hen binary 1, or ~he leas~ significan~ bi~, MUst be equivalent to i888/255 Millivol~s, or apprOXiMatelY 4 Millivol~S. 0 f SOd b S ,o r fro M 1 .... ould 1 ike to have a dynaMic ThiS

is sOMe .... hat less than ideal, we 'T' 0 1 ~ down to i Mil I i v 0 It, tog i ve s pee c h ran 9 e To do th i s we woul d have to add another two a good reproduc ~ i on. bits ~o our word to Make -::. word 1 ength, however, does not fit with the standard COMPuter bus SysteMS or RAM d a taw i d t h s . but that is now sOMeth i n9 just speech. and also i t eats up MeMor~ space at a prodigiOUS rate. t hat we wo u I d h ·a v e t 0 got 0 16 bit s I 0 f an overk ill in terMS 0 f qua Ii ty I i ~ a 16 bit word. To fit in ..... i t h Suc h for I f ~he saMple rate 1'~Orking out MeMOr!} requireMents is eas!,l enough. is 6400 per second and the word size is 8 bits then "the "typical 2 second [UP utte~ance will use up 12.8 KBytes of MeMory space, at a transfer rate of 5i.2 Kbits per second. Each utterance is stored as f i 1 enaMe, and has a a separate MaxiMUM size of 64 KBytes. f i 1 e, shou 1 d be ass i gned its own The SysteM in Use the above Ment i oned Due to March editing SysteM was used. of 1991, a I MOS~

5 years 1 ater, f i nanc i a I c onstra i nts it was not unt i 1 that the first cOMputer i zed ( ( sent out. whO are ever ready It is SOMething of an indictMent of to condeMn took alMost 5 years for this advance to appear, available in 1986 and the Matter could have been is ta I king (I know exac t I y what he indeed eager - Months. T ap~C" were Made and the EVP COMMunity "SCience", that it when the design was in nine wrapped up about. -Ed) .... 1. '- is As and is, due to lack of tiMe, largely based on a COMMercial board. the design had to be COMprOMise, There is nothing partiCUlarly fancy about the board - an rate that is adjustable but tied to the clock rate of the PC. it plugs It uses an 8 bit ADC, and has a IBM PS2 expanSion slot. into data for a 18 MHz clock the transfer rate is 32 Kbits per second, which .... ord length Of 8 bitS gives a Nyquist frequency of 4 KHz, or a for a bare I y ac c eptab I e However, it is po i nted out that at this stage it is just a Matter of proving the design. [he MaxiMUM rate is 64 Kbits per second which gives a Hyquist of 8 to KHz Mil-Std-1472D (HUMan Engineering) is the MiniMUM acceptable. 4 KHz, which according top frequenc~

of top frequenc y 0 f 2 KHz. thus and a largely Menu driven and is fixed disk. .... ill work with ei1:her a The software inS1:alling the software it is flopP~ or a necessar~ to Make a directory called VOICE and 1:he ac1:ual set of The advantage of "the prograMS Can be downloaded qui1:e quiCkly. fixed disk is that 1:0 be operational it is onlY necessary to call up Prior 1:0 1ft - n wha~ equa~es ~o the Au~oexec.ba~ f i le in ~he Uoice direc~ory. frOM ~he keyboard, and ~he under I Y i og The so f~ware is eas i I Y is never seen. However, i f one wishes one May wri~e new prOgraMMing prograMs or Modify eXis~ing ones USing ei~her C or BASIC. (Con~inued nex~ Issue)," run DHR--- Bac k in Augus~ tir Ray Ken~ Ha~ional SeMiconduc~or is now prOducing as a DynaMic HOise Reduc~ion Sys~eM. This device is kind of fil~er on a chip, al~hough i~ does ra~her a refers ~o as psychoacoUs~iC prinCiples. include based on reduction device dynaMiC nOise brough~ ~o MY a~~en~ i on a 14 pin dip refered ~o not just SOMe a fil1:er, bu~ wha~ Hational (SU-iO/23) "to work wi1:h for vo ice and MUS i c. this circui~ and preliMinary in a saMple ki~, one of which was sen"t ~o Me. These devices are s~ill in short supply, bu1: Ray Managed ~o ge1: two ThiS was used ~o buil"t a ~est line uni1: for use be1:ween recorder and

AMP on PlaybaCk, The c i rc U i ~ used was as rec oMMended by or be1:ween 1:wo rec orders. I have had very 1 i 1:~ 1 e Hat i Dna I tiMe reSUlts are I1: seeMS 1:0 helP, but only to a qui1:e Marginal degree inconclusive. The and only on SOMe VOices, Mos~ly non-MediuMis~iC level voiceS. dev i se however has no1: ye1: been OP1: i ona I i zed 11: a signal controlled band pass fil~er which has, aMong o~her ~h i ngs, is also user adjus~able. The circui1: as reCOMMended by Ha1:ional, as Mentioned. has been configured for bo"th voice and Music. ThiS Means "tha"t We be 1 i eve read jus"t i ng "the passband "to vo ice frequenc y wi I I he 1 P. bu"t ~ her e has n 0 ~ ye 1: bee n 1: 0 dO have a by be1:tel'. LM1894M and LM1894H. .,.rt'ec"tive tape noise reduction. and Ray has been ~old is capable of doing conSiderably is listed in "the new Hational catalog as the is wide enOUgh 1:0 pass higher Music "tones. a Ha1:iona1 Engineer "tha~ i"t for 1:h i s purpose. "t his. The de ViS e "the band pass The devise is CIa i Me d 1: i Me 1: 0 '18 db TOday, just as I was aboU1: to wr i te th is. I rec e i ved a 1 e~1:er I had Mentioned this devise. Mr MacRae lOOkS forward Incidentally, is writing

a BOOk abou1: TC which will be at 1eas1: partly ThiS is being done at publiShers l'eques"t, so there is no i1: cer1:ainlY is going in interested frOM til' Alec MacRae to WhOM has a 1 so Managed 1:0 obta i n 1:wo 0 f to being able to find the tiMe for experiMentation. Alec "technical. doubt as 1:0 whether i1: will be pUbliShed. And 1:0 TranscoMMUnica1:ion. these dev ices, and seriously " MUS "t" for be a Alec also enc losed ~wo pages frOM a Projec1:s and catalog bY 1:he Maplin Co address. bu1: wi 11 try to find out. what 1 i sted as MO d i f i cat ion s perforMance of the systeM. in England. Unfortunately there I n any case 1:here is an they call 1:he S1:el'eo DynaMi c Ho i se Reduc 1: i on ModU I e 'tha1: i MP r 0 v e is sta1:ed 1: 0 k i 1: And the bas i c "SoundMaster" K i 1:. can be per for Me d on i 1: a MOdules was no ad for SM666, SiMple ~ h e noise with dial. Ray Metal resis1:ors. a pot.. pre fer a b 1 y reCOMMends use of good quali1:y COMPonents, espeCially loW The voltage divider Rl/R2 should be replaced a MU I 1: i t urn cal i bra ted Just how effective these This controls 1:he senSitiVity. a MU 11: i t urn wi 1: h If) - n ( (

in Te recep~ion, s~ill of course, reMains ~o devices are going ~o be be de~erMi ned. i"t a I MOS"t C er"ta i n ~ha't an op't i ona 1 i zed con f i gura~.i on for Te rec ep~ i on wi I I prove "to be ~ore "than e f fee ~ i ve I/M sure we will be hearing More enough to jus~if~ ~he Modest cos~. abou~ these devic es, and to da~e on !,IOU UP inforMa'tion and resul~S. ~r'} to keep Bu~ I "th i nk ""i 11 I froM 't i Me. low Spiri~s and Reverse Uoices--- 5-11) All of us have had ~he experience of receiving voices which are ~oo fas~ or too slow, a't leas~ rela~i"'e ~o ~he ra'te a't Wh i c h we expel' i €one e Severa I h~po'theses have been proposed ~o eXPlain ~his effec~, including "the h,}po~hesis ~ha~ slow voices are frOM higher fas"t voices are Sp i r i ~s who are supposed to bounc e around or "vi bra~e" fas~er or sOMe"th i ng, ~h i s desp i ~e ~he fac ~ ~ha~ when 'these vo ices are speeded up or slowed down as the case May be, ~hey ~urn ou~ ~o be ordinar'} HI' Ken~ has proposed ~he firs~ Spiri~s saying ordinar!,l ~hings. (I canno't sa'} for h,}po~hesis ~ha1: Makes sense, Wh a ~ R a ~ sa i d is "t h a ~ eel' ~ a i n ~ h a

~ 1: his h'} p o"t h e sis i SOl' i gin a 1 ) sin c e is f '0 r us, as a nUMber of researchers have been "told, i"t Ma~ be SiMply a Ma't'ter of s~nchroniza1:ion. We ~f course; SiMPl'} pass "through 1:iMe at a fixed 'think abou~ because ~here is no"thing we ra'te Which we rarel~ even e and 0 i s variable, ~ha~ is i f ~hey can, a~ Will, change ~he ra~e a~ which ~he~ pass ~hrough wha~ we perceive as ~iMe, ~hen ~hiS would Mean c onsc i ous e f for~ ~o s~nc hron i ze wi ~h our ~he~ wou I d have "to Make a ~ iMe And ~his could be difficul~ for ~heM ~o do. 1: i Me iss 0 Me"t h i n 9 d i f f ere n ~ for S pi I' i 1: s ~ han to be ~he proper speed for us. in order for ~he i I'" vOi c e ~ 0 S P i r i ~ s ~ i Me a1: leas~ ~o Me. 0 ~ her han d , 0 n th e c han 9 eo i ~ . "t 0 i 1: i f "tiMe "theM reverse voice. rur~her, i f for is variable, i~ May also be So ~ha~ reverse voices May be ~he resul~ of ~heM no~ bidirectional. in the oppos i ~e d i rec"t i on ~han we are rea 1 i

zing "they are "trave 1 i ng 1:hrough wha1: we perceive as 1:iMe. Or i f such be 1:he case, 1:hen perhaps ~hey delibera"tely ~ravel in the opposi~e direc"tion briefly Af1:er all reverse voices are in order 1:0 record a perhaps ~he very bes~ evidence we have ~ha~ Te Ho one is for real. can say ~ha~ a reverse voice is just a stray radio signal picked up Is tiMe variable and/or bidirectional for by our radio or recorder. We 11 we don / t know for sure I but we do know our Sp i r i t ~hat ~iMe is aSSOCiated wi"th Mat"ter. And we know "tha"t spirits live in a non-Material realM where they are not subjec"t to other Material c onstra i n"ts • tha"t i t Mi gh"t poss i b I Y be 0 f ~ i Mep i ec e, SOMe he I p clock or wa"tch with a sweep second hand, near "the receiving s'}s~eM, in order ~o give theM a clear visual indica~ion not onl,} of the rate a~ which we are experiencing ~iMe, but also of ~he direction. HI' Kent has Men"t i oned to pi ac e SOMe kind 0 f "to our Transpartners, fr i ends? Reverse 1)0 i c es--- Severa 1 Mon~h ago Mary and in Making Movie and TV f i IMS. I happened 5-8) onto par~ of a TV progra ..... tha~ had "to With how cer~ain ~ricks are !-"M sure all of you

have seeM done As an cO .... Mercials and o~h'?r things 1:ha~ are SiMpl,} exaMple SOMeone ~alking in a COMMercial while hOlding a bo"t~le over ~ h e g 1 ass and a 9 I ass b a C k UP i S a car p e 1: hOi din g an e MP t ~ pia 1: e w i ~ hap i e ceo f pie s 1: and i n g splattered on ~he carpe~ at her fee~. While she is ~alking ~he pie i n wh i c h ~ h e l i qUi d i s pori n 9 b 0 1: tIe. i n to t h e 0 n 0 I' a C 0 MMe I' cia 1 i n wh i c haL ad,} i ~ s elf 0 u 1: 0 f iMPOSSible. 18 - 34 gathers i "tse I f up and do ~his? -- Believe i~ "falls" or not, bac k UP they are spea~;~g backwards. onto the p I ate. Ho.... dO is then shown bac kwards is being filMed, shot forward. pie falls off The sequenc e is to glass and the The Ii qu i d flows the plate onto the -~re actually talking backwards. the peop I e frOM bot~ I e down floor. But the people, who have practiced their while "this the lines very carefully, "to be speak i ng segMent Ho .... do norMally, while SOMething abSOlutely technique very siMilar to

reverse ~hey learn ~o do ~his? taping. They say their lines baCkward on a recorder, which is no Mean task as they not only Must say the words in reverse order, but MUSt pronounce the phoneMes of each word in reverse order, and then ~hey play the tape backwards ~o see how natural they sound. This It is 0 f course proc ess is then repeated unt i I qu i te few lines. There are only a few people who are talented at dOing thiS. seeM iMPOSSible happens. ted i ous and can requ i re severa 1 days they get it ri ght . just to I earn a By a When What does all this have ~o do .... ith Te? Just this; perhaps there are Spiri~s who have also practiced speaking backwards in order to deliberately .... 01' I d speak to US have gone to great pains ~o prove to us that they eXist, and as was noted ear Ii er, reverse vo ices are SOMe 0 f the very best ev i denc e we ha'- -, in th i s Manner. Many in the Sp i I' i t In a recent letter frOM HI' DaVid fox, an Electronics Engineer in England, he told Me he had received a voice in the reverse Mode wh i c h h e r e cog n i zed as t hat 0 f his fat her . i s in the Spirit World, but I

would say it is extreMely unlikely that he is in SOMe other Universe which is traveling backwards in tiMe relative to our own. D a v i d .... s Dad In the TV prograM we saw, it was Mentioned that speCial recorders were used .... hich were capable of playing the tape backward without flipping it over as of course is necessary with an ordinary I was not aware that there were suCh recorders. However, recorder. indeed exist, and told Me about one HI' Kent told Me revers i b Ie but also vari abl e speed. Model wh i ch (As in fact Ray has arranged the use Of one of versus 3 speed) these Machines for several weeks to exaMine voice saMples. I do not have the brand naMe or a distributer address, but if you .... ould like to have one of these Machines and have $1,888 you don't need, I can find out this inforMation for you. that they do is not onl y And and that Reverse 1J0ices--- 5-C) Dan McKee along .... ith several others have been told by certain voices ~hat the person speaking is in another Material Universe tiMe rela~ive ~o ~heM, which is why ~heir voices seeM to be backward to "terM Universe Means _~. everyth i ng I I other Uni':erses" is self con~radic~ory. There is onlY one. there can be only one because ex i sts. Un i verses" are feed i n9 us Bu 11. .. ~

I - - - Or are they? By definition includes everything ~hat en"t i ties who are te 11 i ng us about "other According ~o Webster'S dic"tionary "the s i ngu 1 ar. traveling back .... ard The phrase There fore the one ex i sts . that are "the It in i s- .... e There are SOMe who believe there can be More ~han one Universe Itl - U ( ( 1: 0 ';;I i 1: hi n 1: he:) b s: e I" vel" that Since all fa c-t , bee vel" y 1: h i n g T h a"t is:, '1110 u I d , ina c 1: u a I and "to an Observer ';;IOU 1 d appear "to be i n an~ given one, "the i I" own ~he only one because interaction of any na~ure between Universes is "t h e i I" i )o.'IP 0 s: 5 i b 1 e . t hat ex i st s . The y own IJ n i vel" s e further believe is i~possible, that two or ~ore separate Universes could occupy what we wo u 1 d t hi n k ThiS is a prepos"terous theory. Who could possibly propose or S t e p hen bel i eve a n ~ ... t hi n g HaWk i ng-Ca~br i dge Un i vers i"'ty, Alexander Vii enk i n- Tu fts Un i vers i ty, Sidney ColeMan-Harvard. Institute

Of Joseph Polchinski-University of Technology, Willy Texas, Edward Tryon-Hunter COllege, Lawrence Susskind-Stanfort, Steven Weinberg-University of Texas. interac"tion be"tween Universes I I spa ce" a"t 1: h e s a tole ""t i tole" . Alan Guth-Massachuset"'ts 1 ike 1: hiS? We 1 1, let 5 e a C hUn i .... e I" s e , jus"'t 1 is"'t 3 fischler .;i 5 1: h e :s a .... e few: and i) f a Reverse Uoices--- :,lour expel" i enc es wi th reverse vo ices, for pub lie a1: i on I would like to invite all of you to tell 5-0) in us about I think, would be one of the next two issues. Of special in1:erest, fr i end, re 1 at i ve, or so~eone else you have "the reverse 1,10 ice 0 f The voice of one or ~ore people, known or known fro~ here. forward AHO T~anspar"tner, who/s voice has COMe researc hers have found tha1: in rev i ewi ng, in reverse ~ode. Severa I tapes wh i c h had been rec orded pre v i ous 1 y. 1:here "the reverse MOde, were suc h ~o~Munication had been requested at "'the "'ti~e the recording was .... ade. In so~e cases the operator had not even heard of reverse voices at the 1:iMe of recording. Have you had this experience? Have any of these reverse voices told you where they are? If so, --Where? What there are is your OPinion of

1:hese VOices? entities COMing through "to us in "this Manner? do you 1:hink in bo1:h reverse "'through vo ices tapes, thOUgh 1:hese even Why no on I low low Very Very level voices--- that it is of ThiS standPoint is it/s frequency. level voice reception. 6) Whether one believes i1: "to be extreMely weak MediuMiS1:iC reception, a non-M~~~U~istic nature, or believes as do the Most iMportant kind cons i dered frOM one standpo i nt, is probab I y of reception. It is, by far, Much ~ore frequent and COMMon on voice recordings than is "the ~uch to understand TransMediu~istic better quality rec ept ion. saMp 1 e tape recorded by anyone (I do not Make a practice of dOing this I have no"'t de"'tec"'ted the because it is too "'tiMe conSUMing). on which presenc e I in I"'t seeMS very prObable "'to Me "'tha1: could unders"'tand theM or no"'t. Te as "nor~al" tiMe "'to COMe voices Will recep1:ion, while at 1:he saMe "tiMe to be considered as the excep1:ion. I cannot rec a 11 hav i ng ever close 1 y ex aMi ned a be considered TransMediuMis1:ic such voices will COMe 1,.'0 ices, whether 0 f at 1 east a few suc h very far easier low 1 eve 1 and SUCh non-~ediuMistic voices are at such low level that, unlike TM vo ices, they c anno"t, ! n other words the voice has a signal/noise ratiO of zero, or as I have for sure un1:i1 receiving a

recent long suspec1:ed bu1: didn"1: kno .... ' leti:er frOM Mr MacRae, ~ay even have a negative signal/noise ra1:io. Or 1:0 use the 1:echnical "tel"'M, "the VOice is "MaSk" by noise. in MOS"t cases, be observed on a sc ope. noise How COUld that is as we pOSSi b ly unders"tand any loud as, or even a little voice ~hat is louder than, buried in 1:he voice? 18 - 36 r i rst, bee ause we ree ogn i ze "the pattern 0 f i n nor~a 1 C onversat i on we understand words bee ause 0 f "tWO We 11, frequenc i es fac tors. that constitute the words. And second, because the wordS are louder than any background nOise, which Makes the frequency pattern quite easy 1:0 hear. Where there is a zero, or negative, Signal/noise ratio we have lost the aMPlitude factor, but the frequency pattern of the words have had "the experience of trying in a very nOiSY so ... eone still present. All of us a conversation with carry to on ~ ~ .. ::;> Score 0 901 FIt- 10l ~~~ ______________ ~~~~Ise -6 db Odb +6 db the bac kground no i se is just as loUd or even a env i ron ... ent where li"ttle lOuder than the voice Of the person talking to us. In these conditions we can still carryon the conversation. And although we ... ay of "ten Misunderstand a Word, or ... iss a word entirely. it

is still poss i b I e to recognize voice frequency patterns against a baCkground of louder noise. in for ... at ion bec ause our to C o ...... un i c ate ... i nds are ab 1 e Ac cord i ng to Mr Mac Rae, who knows far More about 'th i S e f fec t than I, at a S/H ratio of +6 DB about 90% of what is said wi 11 be understood. Bu't "this falls off raPidly until at -6 DB, even though words can still be understood, it will be onlY about 10% of what is actually said. Alee has this 'to say about the ... asking effect: "MaSking MaSking heard. is In where nOise the case of Masks a ... 0 nos y 1 1 a b i c wo r d S signa I, prevent i n9 d n d wh i t e it frOM being noise if the 16 - 37 ( ( is + Sdb "then Wha1: Signal/Moise ra1:io C orrec 1:, (for a person wi i:h good hear- i ng) . "the score .... i 11 be abou1: 10% against S/H curve qui1:e shallow. Bu"t be1:ween 10 and 90 the curve is steep. (fig 5) is !"leard wi 11 be around 36% 6db "then "the slope of "the %age is also "to 106% the slope FrOM 16% "to 0% is shallow, "the S /H is frOM 96% I f "the "the effects of -:OMputer prograM

han die con tin U 0 U s wh i ten 0 i s e . (coMPu1:er edi "tin9 -Ed) does no"t 3"t However, i s in i sus e f u 1 i "t pre sen t reducing IMPulse nOise, whe"ther iMPulse noise. per-iodic or aperiodic, has a Masking effect b~ (par"tl~) "deafening" for a Ma1:ter Of Milliseconds, disabling i t teMporaril~, so 1:he ear, ThiS "that an~ s~llables iMMediatel~ following Ma~ not be heard. is due 1:0 MOS1: of phenOMenon "the siMul"taneousl~ in refractive Mode. is SiMilar "to "that Of A6C available population of neur-ons being in radiO and Wh ere false cue-ing and Masking. iMpUlse nOise results in two unwanted phenOMena charac1:eriS"tic of I f we had a wa~ of sl ic ing out "the '>Ie ini:erprei:ation BUi: 1:0 do 1:hat would reqUire ~illisecond preCise a perforMance not possible wi"th Mechanical cue and reView So Much EUP, "those SMall sections of ~ould go SOMe way "toward reducing aMbiguities in "the of [UP utterances. edi"ting sys"teMs." iMPUlses occured "tiMe where "then On The Horizon--- I believe "to be 7) a significan"t step in post r-ecep"tion pr-ocessing through apPlication of "the COMputer editing 1:eChnique. Bu"t "thiS is no"t the end of "the line. As Alec says "this is a Alec HacRae has "taken what fir-st step. frequenc i eS Today's average PC As ever-yone knows cOMputers are fast. but fast. Relative to the clock speed of a MOdern desktop COMPuter, "the "tr-ave 1 i ng at a sna i

1 highest Many pace. Businesses and individuals are USing MachineS running at 26-33 MHz. Hew Machines just COMing on the Market run at 40-50, even as high as in the 180-150 MHz 66 MHz. region. running as fast as i 6Hz. On the draWing boards are Machines that will be And next generation COMputers will be is prObablY running at 12-16 MHz. the hUMan vo ice are There "re dUMb, 0 f I f we take an ordinary COMPuter of ~oday running a"t lets say 21 MHZ (ain't no such clOCk speed but I like the figure), and COMPare find "th i s wi th the highest hUMan YO ice frequenc y is 3,000 cycles per second while ~he ~ha~ the voice frequency in ThiS Means COMPUi:er 'Joice to COMplete effeC1:, the COMputer has cOMplei:ed frequency, one CYCle at 7,000 cycles, or 3,506 cycles for each half cyCle cOMple"ted by "the voice. is running a~ 21,000,000 cycles per second. in ~he length of "tiMe i t "takes 1:he "tha"t we need, we it"s highest "tha1: c yc 1 es. ThiS pr-esen~s SOMe Most The Main Gne of which is 1:ha"t a COMPuter ~an do a LOT of ~atheMatics in 3,500 C 1 oc k for exaMp 1 e, Measure "the <Jurat i on 0 f eac h half CYCle and dele1:e frOM 1:he da1:a string any half cycles tha"t were found to have a duration of More ~han 1/600 sec or less "than 1/6,800 freqUency of sec. frequency of 300Hz

would be 299 Hz would be totall~ delei:ed while a in fact could be done so prec iselY 1:hat a interesting possibilities. I t C ou 1 d, This 16 - 38 aMp 1 i 1: u de. f i 11: e r ? ass e d at f u 1 1 .... ho"s corners .... ould be absolutely square instead of 3db rolloffs, and WhO.i" 5 "s 1 opes" .... ou I d be ver1: i cal. Wi th the proper prograMi n9, the two bandpass frequencies could be adjusted to any values at the touch Of a 1: hen for M a ban d pas s fe .... buttons. T his '1010 u 1 d eye 1 e But >:h i 5 and dec ide there are probab 1 y i s on 1 y one per i Meter, a dozen others a reasonably fast COMputer could take a long lOOk at for each ha 1 f .... hether it shou 1 d be in the data inc 1 uded For exaMPle we string as part of the voice, or deleted as nOise. kno .... that Voice is Sine wave and noise is randOM. We alSO know that when a PhoneMe is spoken the aMplitude of each half cycle gradually increases or decreases relative The COMPuter could be prograMMed to Measure and COMpare each half cycle to an average Of say the preViOUS 5 or 18 half cycles, and if it is .... ithin say 10% or 20%

of that average aMplitude then pass it along is 50% or 75% above average, then it as part 0 f 1:he va ice. the data string as a nOise spike. .... ould be SiMply deleted There are so Many ha If C yc 1 es in eac h PhoneMe that a fe.... wou I d not be Missed. abnorMal half cycles are present, espeCially of above average aMPli1:ude, 1:hey definitely Make a voice difficult to understand. to previous half cycles. If i 1: such .... hen frOM But As of COMPuters thousands to eaCh voice half cyCle, aM sure 1:hose who are knowledgeable beCOMe faster, to of clock cycles the po i nt where there wi 11 be tens the aMount Of MatheMatical analysis that can be done on each half CYCle If even I can iMagine such fu1:ure will beCOMe Virtually unliMited. low 1 eve 1 , non - Me diu Mis tiC, v 0 ice cia r i fie at ion, po s sib iii tie s for these areas can then I conceive of More sophisticated Possibilities that I cannot even ThiS is not going to happen iMagine. tOMorrow, or next Month. But it wi 11 ha ... ~en. MOdern tec hno logy, in The real question all areas, is advancing on an exponential curve. then, but If the United States set out to rather how Clarify TC reception with the saMe deterMination that it set out to put Men on 1:he Moon, the job would be

done in a year or two. As the Situation stands i t is going to take longer, but the result will be the saMe. to whether TC rec ept i on wi 11 be CiaI' if i ed, But don"'t hold your breath. long will it take. is not as in 18 - )~ ( ( Are Mi c rophones the ear 1 y 1970s :3) Reall~ Hecessar~?--- so~e of ~he very firs~ in this Coun~ry ~o be La~oreaux bro~hers were AMong the Man~ experiMents they did was to cic'tive in EUP research. Joe subs~i~ute several Radio ShaCk coils for reported ~hat the~ did get reception by this Method, but that i t was no better than by using a Microphone. their Microphone. I n :: oMpar i son Recently Ray Kent carried this experiMentation fur~her by doing a stereo /'I\i c rophone on one i MPedanc e co i 1 subst i tuted for "the Mi c rophone equ i pMent and rec e i ved at ThiS voice was of exactlY the sa~e d i rec"t rec order, and a high on least one gOOd quality voice. qualit~ on both Channels. There was no discernible difference. His daUghter used "the o~her . c hanne 1 .... i 1:h th i s 0 f a to do over a nu~ber 0 f weeks Wr i t i ng these papers is a ver~ tiMe c onsuMi ng i ssue--- Th i s 9) 0 f very job wh i

ch I have li~ited available tiMe. When I had no intention of Making it anYWhere near this long. However, as inforMation was received "tiMe went on, More and More Consequently this issue becaMe Which longer and More lOnger possible to pub J ish i 1: by MY "target" date 0 f Mov 1st. I I.upe you wi 11 find the delay justified by "the additional Material included. I started this issue SOMe 1:i~e ago, tiMe conSUMing, and it was no felt should be interesting inCluded. bec ause I issue--- Th i s Mac hi ne I have been work i ng on for over a year as Hext 10) I BM/c lone, wh ic h perMi tted. pub 1 i c at i on and other TC work. will be threefold: of software packages with which wr i te the paper cnnsiderably shorter than this, -- perhaps only a ! have just finished building a 2SMHz, 386 t i ~e future task in wr i t i ng the next issue To configure the systeM and learn to use a type to use severa I and to reason the next paper wi 11 be to Me, I r or th i s aM cO~Pletely unfaMiliar, c o~pu~er wh i ch i s intended My to be used few pages. I earn how i tse If. new a 11 for to is Spirit VOices is edited and publiShed, as tiMe and Materials perMit, by Bill Weisensale, P.O. Box B.Q., Barstow CA

92312+4, United States of AMerica. Ho subscriptions are accepted at this tiMe. COPies are free upon request, to those who have all previous issues back to and Eac h new issue Must be requested by return i n9 the inc IUd i ng SU 7. AMer i c an address coupon enc losed in the current copy. Association - Electronic Voice PhenOMena Me~ber Dedicated to developMent of TranscoMMunication for the enlightenMent of HUManity 1ft - ~tI The Exclusion Cage. However, this also Makes the physical universe a sort of informational "exclusion cage." We have seen that what is going to happen is determined by strong probabilities ... but what is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN is also determined by these strong probabilities. So, apples shall fall down, but not UP ... ; electrons shall repel each other, not ATTRACT ... ; thou shalt not LEVITATE nor SEE THE FUTURE nor be in any way paranormal - which is to say, UN-USUAL ... of LOW PROBABILITY. However, it is possible to "weaken" probability, locally. Weakening Probability. Probability is at its lowest where the sequence of events, locally, is random - where the sequence of events is unpredictable. Thus you find "paranormal" phenomena are often associated with random events. White noise, atomic decay, tea-leaves, the I Ching yarrow stalks, even earlier, the cracks produced in turtle shells by heat, all random processes. Note that paranormal simply means beyond normal, or improbable. One can, however, lower probability by determinate means, and this occurs in

most of the workable EVP methods. It is, I suggest, the meaning behind Weisensale's received message to use many repetitions. The Delta. Taking up this point, some years ago I developed the Delta method. This used 4 loudspeakers connected as an acoustic bridge, and acting interactively as microphones also, in a highly reverberant small enclosure. Such were the number of repeated wavefronts that probability was already low due to the complexity of determination. This was further reduced by the "probabilistic feedback loops" introduced by interactions. Probabilistic Feedback Loops. If a factor A is determined by three other factors B, C, D; and if B is likewise determined by three factors - A, C, and D ... then you can see that the state of A is partly determined by B, which is itself partly determined by A. Thus B affects itself, as does A, and the end result of this is to introduce probabilistic "interference fringes" - a sort of "banding" or binary distribution, much as in Chaos Theory effects, whereby probability may be minimal local?" The breakdown of probability now puts subtle and otherwise unseen influences on the same footing as normal effects within the Exclusion Cage - that is, Information can "seep into" the normal, (usual), Physical universe that is normally excluded by Certainties. We know from a correspondent that both the Koenig (early system --Ed) and the Alpha systems use swept-frequency signals. A swept-frequency signal is for most of the time an entirely predictable sequence. But one

cannot sweep the frequency in one direction forever ... a is here that the signal becomes instantaneously indeterminate. transition point arrives ... and it 10-17 The Exclusion Cage. However, this also Makes the physical universe a sort of informational "exclusion cage." We have seen that what is going to happen is determined by strong probabilities … but what is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN is also determined by these strong probabilities. So, apples shall fall down, but not UP ... ; electrons shall repel each other, not ATTRACT ... ; thou shalt not LEVITATE nor SEE THE FUTURE nor be in any way paranormal - which is to say, UN-USUAL ... of LOW PROBABILITY. However, it is possible to "weaken" probability, locally. Weakening Probability. Probability is at its lowest where the sequence of events, locally, is random - where the sequence of events is unpredictable. Thus you find "paranormal" phenomena are often associated with random events. White noise, atomic decay, tea-leaves, the I Ching yarrow stalks, even earlier, the cracks produced in turtle shells by heat, all random processes. Note that paranormal simply means beyond normal, or improbable. One can, however, lower probability by determinate means, and this occurs in most of the workable EVP methods. It is, I suggest, the meaning behind Weisensale's received message to use many repetitions. The Delta. Taking up this point, some years ago I developed the Delta method. This used 4 loudspeakers connected as an acoustic bridge, and acting interactively as microphones also, in a

highly reverberant small enclosure. Such were the number of repeated wavefronts that probability was already low due to the complexity of determination. This was further reduced by the "probabilistic feedback loops" introduced by interactions. Probabilistic Feedback Loops. If a factor A is determined by three other factors B, C, D; and if B is likewise determined by three factors - A, C, and D ... then you can see that the state of A is partly determined by B, which is itself partly determined by A. Thus B affects itself, as does A, and the end result of this is to introduce probabilistic "interference fringes" - a sort of "banding" or binary distribution, much as in Chaos Theory effects, whereby probability may be minimal local?" The breakdown of probability now puts subtle and otherwise unseen influences on the same footing as normal effects within the Exclusion Cage - that is, Information can "seep into" the normal, (usual), Physical universe that is normally excluded by Certainties. We know from a correspondent that both the Koenig (early system --Ed) and the Alpha systems use swept-frequency signals. A swept-frequency signal is for most of the time an entirely predictable sequence. But one cannot sweep the frequency in one direction forever ... instantaneously a transition point arrives ... and indeterminate. is here that the signal becomes it 10-17 EXPERIMENTAL PART 1 TC TRANSMITTER One of the reception methods that is most attractive from an experimental standpoint, is the radio -transmitter method. This method uses

a local, low power, wireless microphone, type transmitter. Since there is every indication that Transcommunication is amplitude modulation, this type of experimentation of course, requires an AM transmitter. Although numerous wireless microphone type transmitters are available through Radio Shack and other sources, all of these transmitters are FM rather than AM. Some time ago I was able to locate a schematic for a low power AM transmitter (SU-i0/19). This transmitter has an effective range of only a few feet, which is ideal for TC research. It will put out a clean RF signal which can be AF Modulated by an electronic white noise generator (SU-9/21), a built in tone generator for alignment as shown, or can be configured }o accept an external AF carrier such as the signal from a carrier recorder, etc. A rotary switch is used to select the Modulation input or select RF only. The unit can be battery powered or powered by a small duel voltage supply. If a power supply is used it should be in a separate enclosure as the noise generator is quite sensitive to EM, especially 60 Hz hunt. The tuner is a standard capacitor used in shall broadcast band receivers. The coil is 100 turns of coil wire, center taped at 50 turns, wound on a 5/16" ferrite rod. A replacement Radio Shack telescoping antenna is used, but an ordinary piece of hookup wire will do. In blind comparison experimentation, this transmitter with a shall portable broadcast receiver, was approved over

the Airband Method although there was no noticeable improvement in absolute reception quality. A STARTING POINT In the "cats whisker" days of radio, Hobbyists, later to be known as radio Amateurs, started with the very simplest of crystal receivers and worked upward through trial and error. During these early days there was a great deal of experimentation with a large variety of circuits. As time went on circuits which proved to be of benefit were further refined and incorporated into more advanced designs. Others that did not work as well, were simply dropped by the way side and became history. There is no reason why Transreceiver technical development should not follow the same path. In fact, to a certain extent it already has, and it is probably inevitable it will continue to do so. The only real difference being that with the existence of modern electronics, sophisticated test equipment, manufactured components, computer Modelling, stereo recorders, etc., TR development should be much faster than was the early development of radio. Just as one example, if it had been possible in crystal set days, to stereo record reception from the same transmitter 10-18 EXPERIMENTAL PART 1 TC TRANSMITTER One of the reception methods that is most attractive from an experimental standpoint, is the radio -transmitter method. This method uses a local, low power, wireless microphone, type transmitter. Since there is every indication that Transcommunication is amplitude modulation, this type of experimentation of course, requires an AM transmitter. Although numerous wireless microphone type

transmitters are available through Radio Shack and other sources, all ofthese transmitters are FM rather than AM. Some time ago I was able to locate a schematic for a low power AM transmitter (SU-iO/19). This transmitter has an effective range of only a few feet, which is ideal for TC research. It will put out a clean RF signal which can be AF Modulated by an electronic white noise generator (SU-9/21), a built in tone generator for alignment as shown, or can be configured }o accept an external AF carrier such as the signal from a carrier recorder, etc. A rotary switch is used to select the Modulation input or select RF only. The unit can be battery powered or powered by a small duel voltage supply. If a power supply is used it should be in a separate enclosure as the noise generator is quite sensitive to EM, especially 60 Hz hunt. The tuner is a standard capacitor used in shall broadcast band receivers. The coil is 100 turns of coil wire, center taped at 50 turns, wound on a 5/16" ferrite rod. A replacement Radio Shack telescoping antenna is used, but an ordinary piece of hookup wire will do. In blind comparison experimentation, this transmitter with a shall portable broadcast receiver, was approved over the Airband Method although there was no noticeable improvement in absolute reception quality. A STARTING POINT In the "cats whisker" days of radio, Hobbyists, later to be known as radio Amateurs, started with the

very simplest of crystal receivers and worked upward through trial and error. During these early days there was a great deal of experimentation with a large variety of circuits. As time went on circuits which proved to be of benefit were further refined and incorporated into more advanced designs. Others that did not work as well, were simply dropped by the way side and became history. There is no reason why Transreceiver technical development should not follow the same path. In fact, to a certain extent it already has, and it is probably inevitable it will continue to do so. The only real difference being that with the existence of modern electronics, sophisticated test equipment, manufactured components, computer Modelling, stereo recorders, etc., TR development should be much faster than was the early development of radio. Just as one example, if it had been possible in crystal set days, to stereo record reception from the same transmitter 10-18 ---